Burn Rack Docking Interface for Automated IHS Power Connection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The manual docking process of information handling systems (IHS) in a burn rack is time-consuming and labor-intensive, slowing down the manufacturing process and increasing workforce requirements.
Innovation Solution
A docking interface with a substrate featuring a first power receiver and transmitter that allows for automatic power connection and data transmission, enabling the IHS to be automatically docked and undocked from a power and network source without manual intervention.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If manual docking is used to connect IHS to power and network sources, then the docking process can be completed with simple equipment, but the manufacturing process slows down and workforce requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The docking interface enables automatic self-docking of the IHS to the burn rack. The power receiver and transmitter components automatically connect when the IHS is placed in the rack, eliminating the need for manual connection operations and enabling automated testing processes.
Solution Approach 2:
The docking interface acts as an intermediary between the IHS and the burn rack power/network sources. It provides standardized power receivers and transmitters that mediate the connection, allowing automated docking while managing the complexity through a dedicated interface component.
2Loss of time
If manual docking is used, then equipment complexity remains low, but labor intensity and time consumption increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs self-docking through automatic recognition and connection of power and data interfaces. When the IHS is inserted into the rack, the docking interface automatically establishes electrical connections without requiring manual intervention, significantly reducing docking time.
Solution Approach 2:
The power receivers and transmitters are pre-configured in the docking interface before the IHS arrives. This preliminary preparation of connection interfaces enables immediate automatic connection upon IHS insertion, eliminating manual setup time.
3Productivity
If automatic docking is implemented, then manufacturing efficiency increases, but the docking interface complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The docking interface is segmented into distinct functional components: power receivers, power transmitters, data connectors, and mechanical positioning elements. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to enable automated docking, managing overall system complexity through modular design.
Solution Approach 2:
The docking interface is designed as a universal platform that can accommodate different IHS models. The power receivers and transmitters are configured to work with multiple device types, enabling automated docking across product variants without requiring model-specific customization, thus improving throughput while controlling complexity.
Data Source
AI summary
A first docking interface includes a substrate. A first power receiver is formed in the substrate. The first power receiver is operable to be automatically docked to a power provider, such as a burn rack, and to receive power from the power provider. A first power transmitter formed in the substrate and coupled to the first power receiver. The first power transmitter is operable to receive power from the first power receiver and transmit power to an information handling system (IHS).


