Electronic Control Module for Radiant Tube Burner Combustion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current control systems for radiant tube burners in industrial furnaces fail to effectively manage variations in gas characteristics and supply conditions, leading to inefficient combustion, increased pollutant production, and safety risks due to uncontrolled air-gas ratios and rapid burner operation cycles.

Innovation Solution

An electronic control module that measures combustion quality and adjusts oxidant and fuel flow rates in real-time to maintain optimal air-gas ratios, equipped with sensors for residual oxygen measurement and flow rate calculation, enabling closed-loop regulation of burner operations and quick malfunction detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If burners operate in all-or-nothing mode with fixed cycle times, then device complexity is reduced, but combustion efficiency deteriorates and pollutant production increases due to uncontrolled air-gas ratios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidcombustion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the oxidant and fuel supply valve openings based on real-time combustion quality measurements, transitioning from fixed all-or-nothing operation to adaptive proportional control that optimizes combustion efficiency while managing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (valve opening percentages) based on measured combustion quality and calculated air-gas ratios, allowing continuous adjustment of fuel and oxidant flow rates to maintain optimal combustion conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If burner operation cycles are rapid, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to uncontrolled pressure fluctuations and safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating outputVSAvoidoperational safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements closed-loop feedback control where combustion quality measurements and flow rate calculations continuously inform adjustments to valve positions, ensuring safe and reliable operation even during rapid burner cycling and ignition/extinction transitions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs preliminary calculations of air-gas ratios and predicts combustion quality before actual combustion occurs, allowing preventive adjustments to valve openings that maintain safety margins during rapid operational changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If excess air is increased to compensate for variable gas characteristics, then reliability is improved, but loss of energy increases due to heating non-combustion air

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion stabilityVSAvoidenergy wasted on excess air
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the oxidant flow rate parameter based on calculated air-gas ratios and measured combustion quality, replacing the static excess air approach with adaptive control that maintains reliability while minimizing energy waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical/procedural approach of adding fixed excess air with an electronic control system that calculates optimal oxidant flow rates based on real-time measurements, substituting physical waste with intelligent control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of energy

If real-time combustion quality measurement and closed-loop control are implemented, then combustion efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control module performs multiple functions including combustion quality assessment, flow rate calculation, valve control, and safety monitoring within a single integrated system, improving combustion efficiency while limiting the increase in overall device complexity through functional consolidation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution optimizes combustion efficiency, reduces pollutant production, ensures safe operation by maintaining required air-gas ratios, and quickly detects malfunctions, improving overall burner performance and safety.

Implementation Method 1

a means for measuring the quality of the combustion installed in the combustion flue gas discharge pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResidual oxygen measurement:

Implementation Method 2

the at least one burner comprising a supply valve in fuel, an oxidizer supply valve and a combustion flue gas evacuation pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP3390911B1Electronic control module and method for controlling the operation and safety of at least one radiant tube burner
Publication Date: 2021.07.21 FIVES STEIN SA
  • EP3390911B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3390911B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3390911B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a control module for controlling at least one radiant tube burner, the burner comprising a fuel supply valve, an oxidant supply valve and a combustion fume discharge conduit, wherein the control module comprises: a means for measuring the quality of combustion, installed in the combustion fume discharge conduit of said at least one burner, a unit for measuring the fuel flow rate, a unit for measuring the oxidant flow rate, and a means for driving said at least one burner, acting on the opening percentages of the oxidant and fuel supply valves of said at least one burner in order to adjust the ratio of the oxidant flow rate to the fuel flow rate on the basis of the information delivered by the means for determining combustion quality.