Burner Duct Blockage Detection via Ionization Current Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current burner assembly systems fail to accurately detect blockages in the air-supply duct or flue, leading to incorrect ionization-current setpoints, which can result in reduced air-ratio increment and increased CO levels, and may require shutdown due to potential critical combustion and emissions issues.

Innovation Solution

A control device that adjusts the ionization-current setpoint and evaluates the resulting fuel-control signal to detect blockages by comparing it with specified maximum values, allowing for real-time detection and prevention of critical combustion conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the air-supply duct/flue is covered and/or blocked, then the volumetric air flow is significantly reduced, but the rotational speed detection system does not detect the change, leading to incorrect ionization-current setpoint

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of blockageVSAvoidcombustion safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary testing at multiple fixed speed points to establish baseline ionization signals before normal operation. This allows the system to detect drift caused by blockages by comparing current signals against the established baselines, enabling early detection before critical combustion conditions occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors ionization signals and compares them against stored baseline values from preliminary tests. When deviations exceed predetermined thresholds, the system triggers alarms or shutdowns. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures reliable detection of blockages while maintaining safe combustion operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If tests to correct ionization signal drift are performed at fixed speed points, then drift detection is possible, but the burner assembly must be shut down if heat cannot be dissipated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveionization signal accuracyVSAvoidburner operation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring complete shutdown for drift correction tests, the system performs partial tests at reduced power levels where heat dissipation is manageable. The system tests at multiple speed points including partial load conditions, allowing drift detection without requiring full shutdown, thus maintaining partial productivity during monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If the ionization-current setpoint is adjusted based on fan speed, then combustion control is achieved, but blockages result in false setpoint values and shifted air-ratio increment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion controlVSAvoidair-ratio accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization tests to establish the relationship between fan speed and ionization current under known good conditions. These baseline relationships are stored and used to detect deviations caused by blockages, allowing the system to distinguish between normal operational variations and actual blockage conditions that would cause false setpoint adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces reliance on mechanical fan speed measurement alone with an electrical field-based ionization monitoring system. By measuring ionization current through an electrode and comparing against baseline electrical characteristics, the system can detect blockages that would otherwise go undetected by mechanical sensors, maintaining accurate air-ratio control even when mechanical indicators fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable detection of blockages and prevention of critical combustion, reducing CO emissions and ensuring stable burner operation by adjusting the ionization-current setpoint and fuel-control signals in real-time.

Implementation Method 1

an ionization current generated at an ionization electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonization: Ionisation

Implementation Method 2

Due to the rectifier effect of a flame, an ionization current only flows in a single direction as a direct current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRectifier effect: Diode

Data Source

PatentUS11231174B2Detecting blockage of a duct of a burner assembly
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 SIEMENS AG
  • US11231174B2 patent drawing
  • US11231174B2 patent drawing
  • US11231174B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure deals with the detection of a blockage in the air-supply duct or flue of a burner assembly. In some embodiments, a method or system may detect blockages in the form of coverings and with burner assemblies to burn fossil fuels. For example, a control device may generate: a first air-control signal; a fuel-control signal by adjusting the actual values of the ionization current to the ionization-current setpoint; a setpoint increased by a specified amount from the ionization-current setpoint; and a changed fuel-control signal by adjusting the actual values of the ionization current to the increased setpoint in the case of a first air-control signal. The control device may evaluate the changed fuel-control signal generated based on the increased setpoint by comparing it with a specified maximum value and based on the evaluation, to detect a blockage. The control device may recognize the blockage based on the evaluation if the fuel-control signal generated using the increased setpoint exceeds the specified maximum value.