Gas Burner Intermediate Tube Flashback Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas-combustion hand tool burners with long lances are prone to flashback when the length-to-diameter ratio is low, posing a risk of destruction, while shortening the lance for ergonomics increases the risk of flashback, and existing solutions fail to address this without compromising flame shape or efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an intermediate tube with a smaller diameter and additional air intake near the injector, which allows for dual air-gas mixing paths, reducing the risk of flashback by adjusting air suction and dilution rates based on pressure, maintaining flame efficiency and shape.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the lance length is reduced for better ergonomics, then the ergonomics of the tool is improved, but the risk of flashback increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveergonomicsVSAvoidflashback risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing process is segmented into two distinct zones: an intermediate tube for primary mixing and the lance for secondary mixing. This segmentation allows the lance to be shorter while maintaining adequate mixing length through the intermediate tube, thus improving ergonomics without increasing flashback risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediate tube is introduced as a mediator between the injector and the lance. This intermediate structure provides a dedicated mixing zone that compensates for the reduced lance length, enabling shorter overall lance length while maintaining safe flashback margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the lance length is increased to reduce flashback risk, then the flashback risk is reduced, but the ergonomics of the tool deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflashback riskVSAvoidergonomics
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing function is divided between the intermediate tube and the lance, allowing the lance to be shorter than traditional designs while maintaining sufficient mixing length through the intermediate tube segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mixing process is extended into a new dimensional space by adding the intermediate tube as a separate structural element between the injector and lance, effectively increasing the mixing path length without increasing the lance length itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If the lance cross-section is increased relative to its length, then the mixing capacity is improved, but the flashback risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing capacityVSAvoidflashback risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing process is divided into two stages with different cross-sectional characteristics: rapid initial mixing in the intermediate tube followed by continued mixing in the lance, allowing optimized cross-sections for each stage that balance mixing capacity with flashback prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different cross-sectional dimensions are applied at different locations: the intermediate tube has a cross-section optimized for initial mixing capacity, while the lance maintains dimensions suitable for continued mixing and flame stability, with each zone having locally optimized properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the risk of flashback by optimizing air-gas mixing, allowing for a shorter lance without increasing flashback risk, while maintaining flame efficiency and ergonomics, as demonstrated by comparative tests showing a significant reduction in flashback pressure and length.

Implementation Method 1

the gas leaving the injector mixes with this air inside the lance, along the latter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

the gas leaving the injector mixes with this air inside the lance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

where the mixture ignites

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 4

the gas leaving the injector mixes with this air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentEP3594571A1Burner for a gas combustion hand tool and hand tool equipped with such a burner
Publication Date: 2020.01.15 GUILBERT EXPRESS SA
  • EP3594571A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3594571A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3594571A1 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

A burner (7) for a gas-powered hand tool comprises a tubular lance (21) associated on one end with a high-pressure gas injector (13) and, on the other, with a combustion zone (25). The lance (21) has at least one first ambient air inlet. The burner (7) further comprises an intercalated tube (55), housed at least partially inside the lance (21), between the injector (13) and the combustion zone (25). This intercalated tube (55) has a second ambient air inlet, this second inlet being located near the first and the injector (13).