Burner Retraction System Pivot Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Burners installed in furnaces are often heavy and cumbersome, making them difficult to remove and maintain safely, especially in limited spaces, with no suitable place to set them down and limited maneuverability.

Innovation Solution

A retraction system that allows for controlled rotation and retraction of the burner out of the installation line, using a mounting assembly, insertion assembly, pivot rod, pivot tube, and stop pin to facilitate safe and efficient removal and maintenance, which can be actuated manually or automatically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of repair

If a burner is removed from a furnace, then maintenance or replacement can be performed, but the burner is heavy and cumbersome making it difficult to handle safely in limited spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburner maintenanceVSAvoidburner handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the static burner installation into a dynamic, controllable movement process. The burner is equipped with a retraction mechanism that allows it to be pulled back along a guide rail, and a rotation mechanism that enables controlled rotation to a maintenance position. This dynamic approach allows the heavy burner to be moved safely and precisely without manual handling in limited spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components including a guide rail that mediates the burner's movement path, a rotation mechanism that mediates the transition from installation to maintenance position, and a control system that mediates the entire process. These intermediaries enable safe handling of the heavy burner by distributing forces and providing controlled movement throughout the limited space around the furnace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of repair

If a burner is retracted from a furnace, then it can be maintained or replaced, but there is limited space to maneuver and handle the burner once retracted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburner maintenanceVSAvoidmaneuvering space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system resolves the space limitation by utilizing multiple dimensions. The guide rail extends in one dimension (away from the furnace), and the rotation mechanism utilizes a second dimension (rotational movement around a pivot point). This two-dimensional movement path allows the burner to be positioned for maintenance without requiring additional three-dimensional space, effectively solving the maneuvering space problem in compact environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a burner is rotated out of the installation line, then the burner hole can be plugged for safety, but the burner may be accidentally rotated or rotated with excessive speed creating high shear stresses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid leakage preventionVSAvoidcontrolled rotation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback control through sensors that monitor the burner's position and speed during rotation. The control system receives this feedback and adjusts the rotation actuator accordingly, slowing down as the burner approaches the horizontal position and stopping precisely when needed. This feedback mechanism prevents accidental rotation and excessive speed, eliminating the risk of high shear stresses while enabling safe burner hole plugging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Strength

If a burner is made heavy and robust, then it can withstand high temperatures and pressures, but it becomes difficult to remove and maintain safely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburner durabilityVSAvoidburner removal
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system resolves the contradiction between strength and ease of operation by making the removal process dynamic rather than static. The heavy burner remains robust for withstanding operational conditions, but during maintenance, the retraction mechanism along the guide rail and the rotation mechanism transform the removal task into a controlled, multi-stage process. This allows the heavy burner to be moved safely using mechanical assistance rather than manual handling, preserving both durability and ease of maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9599333B2Burner retraction system
Publication Date: 2017.03.21 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • US9599333B2 patent drawing
  • US9599333B2 patent drawing
  • US9599333B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A burner retraction system includes a mounting assembly having a mounting sleeve, an insertion assembly having a tubular sleeve including an insertion portion sized and shaped for insertion into the mounting sleeve and an opening therethrough, a pivot rod rigidly mounted to and extending rearwardly from the mounting plate, and a pivot assembly rigidly mounted to the insertion sleeve and including a pivot tube surrounding and coaxially rotatable about the pivot rod, one of the pivot rod and the pivot tube having a slot including a straight axially extending portion and an angled portion extending rearwardly from the straight portion at an angle θ, and a stop pin slidably inserted into the slot in the one of the pivot rod and the pivot tube, the stop pin being secured to the other of the pivot rod and the pivot tube.