Gas Turbine Burner Vortex Generator Lobed Trailing Edge

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas turbine burners face challenges in achieving homogeneous fuel-air mixing due to space limitations, and manufacturing complex vortex generators with multiple lobed shapes is costly and complex.

Innovation Solution

The burner design incorporates vortex generators with a trailing edge featuring a first order lobed shape defined by a second order lobed shape, with additional lobed-shaped walls near the nozzles to enhance mixing, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost by limiting higher order lobed shapes to areas around the nozzles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If vortex generators with multiple lobed shapes (first order and second order) are used throughout the entire structure, then mixing performance is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing second order lobed shape only in specific zones around the nozzles where fuel injection occurs, rather than throughout the entire vortex generator structure. This localized approach concentrates the mixing enhancement where it is most needed while reducing overall manufacturing complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The vortex generator structure is segmented into different zones with different levels of complexity: a first order lobed shape throughout the structure for baseline turbulence, and second order lobed shape only in specific zones around nozzles for enhanced mixing. This segmentation allows optimization of performance versus manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If vortex generators with complex lobed shapes are used, then fuel-air mixing efficiency is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Complex second order lobed shape is applied only in local zones around the nozzles where fuel-air mixing is most critical, rather than throughout the entire vortex generator. This reduces manufacturing cost while maintaining high mixing efficiency where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying complex lobed shapes throughout the entire structure (excessive action), the patent applies them only partially in zones around the nozzles. This partial action is sufficient to achieve the required mixing efficiency while reducing manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Volume of moving object

If space limitations in the burner are considered, then compact design is achieved, but homogeneous mixing of fuel and air becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburner sizeVSAvoidmixing homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses lobed shapes (curved geometries) in the vortex generators to generate rotational flow and turbulence. These curved structures enhance mixing through vortex formation and fluid rotation, achieving homogeneous mixing in a compact space without requiring large burner dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The lobed shapes in the vortex generators create oscillating flow patterns and turbulence as fluid passes through them. This mechanical disturbance enhances mixing efficiency, allowing homogeneous fuel-air mixing to be achieved in the limited space available in the burner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves efficient fuel-air mixing by generating high turbulence around the nozzles while minimizing unnecessary complexity and cost, ensuring effective combustion in gas turbines.

Implementation Method 1

the burners have a duct which includes structures creating turbulence. The air/hot gas passes through these structures acquiring turbulence; the fuel is injected in the turbulent flow such that quick mixing is achieved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentEP3026344B1Burner of a gas turbine
Publication Date: 2019.05.22 ANSALDO ENERGIA SWITZERLAND AG
  • EP3026344B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3026344B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6
  • EP3026344B1 patent drawingFigure 7~10

AI summary

The burner (1) of a gas turbine has a duct (2), a vortex generator (3) extending in the duct (2) and comprising a leading edge (4) and a trailing edge (5). The trailing edge (5) has a first order lobed shape (6). The first order lobed shape (6) is defined by a second order lobed shape (7). Preferably a nozzle (8) for fuel injection is connected to the vortex generator (3) and the second order lobed shape (7) is only provided at the nozzles (8).