Hybrid Inflator Burst Cap Transitional Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing burst caps in hybrid inflators require extremely high bursting pressures to open, leading to excessive deformation and material stress, as they need to counteract both the igniter's pressure and the compressed gas tank's filling pressure, which can result in instability and increased manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A self-supporting burst cap design with a transitional portion from the side wall to the bottom, allowing the bottom to rest on the side wall during pressurization, reducing the required bursting pressure and maintaining structural integrity under high filling pressures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the burst cap is designed to counteract both igniter pressure and compressed gas tank filling pressure, then the burst cap can maintain structural integrity under high filling pressures, but extremely high bursting pressures are required to open the burst cap

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrity under filling pressureVSAvoidbursting pressure required to open
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The burst cap is divided into functionally distinct zones: a crown portion that withstands external filling pressure and a skirt portion that is optimized for controlled bursting. The transition zone between these portions creates a geometric discontinuity that concentrates stress during bursting, allowing the cap to maintain integrity under filling pressure while enabling opening at lower bursting pressures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the burst cap are given different geometric properties tailored to their specific functions. The crown portion has a geometry optimized for withstanding external pressure, while the skirt portion and transition zone have geometries that facilitate controlled bursting at lower pressures. This local differentiation of structural properties resolves the contradiction between maintaining strength and enabling easy opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the burst cap requires extremely high bursting pressures to open, then the burst cap can withstand high filling pressures in the idle mode, but excessive deformation and material stress occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewithstanding filling pressure in idle modeVSAvoidmaterial stress and deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the burst cap into distinct functional zones with optimized geometries, the structure can reliably withstand filling pressure during idle operation while experiencing minimal deformation during bursting. The transition zone acts as a predetermined failure point that concentrates stress, preventing excessive deformation of the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If the burst cap is designed with continuous constant material thickness, then the manufacturing process is simplified, but the burst cap cannot efficiently differentiate between withstanding filling pressure and enabling controlled bursting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidfunctional differentiation for pressure resistance and bursting
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The burst cap employs local geometric variations in the form of transition zones and geometric discontinuities rather than varying material thickness. This approach maintains manufacturing simplicity while achieving functional differentiation: the crown portion geometry optimizes for pressure resistance, while the skirt portion and transition zone geometries facilitate controlled bursting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If higher bursting pressures are used to open the burst cap, then the burst cap can maintain structural integrity, but the igniter must be more powerful and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidigniter system complexity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of designing the burst cap to require high bursting pressures for structural reasons, the invention inverts the approach by designing the burst cap geometry to enable controlled bursting at lower pressures through transition zones and geometric discontinuities. This inversion allows a simpler, less costly igniter system to effectively open the burst cap while maintaining structural integrity during idle operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design lowers the bursting pressure needed to open the burst cap while maintaining high collapse pressure capabilities, reducing material stress and manufacturing costs by forming a self-supporting structure that does not rely on additional components for support.

Implementation Method 1

a transitional portion from the side wall to the bottom is formed so that when the bottom is pressurized on the outside, a portion of the bottom on the igniter compartment side can rest on a portion of the side wall on the igniter compartment side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical support through geometric transition:

Implementation Method 2

maintaining structural integrity under high filling pressures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure resistance through self-supporting structure:

Implementation Method 3

in the case of operation, being adapted to be destroyed by a bursting pressure on the side of the igniter compartment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrotechnical pressure generation:

Data Source

PatentUS9821752B2Hybrid inflator comprising a burst cap, burst cap, airbag module, vehicle safety system and method of manufacturing a burst cap
Publication Date: 2017.11.21 TRW AIRBAG SYSTEMS GMBH
  • US9821752B2 patent drawing
  • US9821752B2 patent drawing
  • US9821752B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a hybrid inflator (10) including a burst cap (20) including a bottom (21) and a sleeve-like side wall (22), the bottom (21) and the side wall (22) delimiting an igniter compartment (23), and the burst cap (20) in the idle mode being pressurized on the outer peripheral side with compressed gas having a filling pressure (PF) which at a functional maximum temperature of the hybrid inflator (10) has a maximum filling pressure (PFmax), and wherein the burst cap (20) can be destroyed by an igniter compartment side bursting pressure in the case of operation. In accordance with the invention, a transitional portion (24) is formed from the side wall (22) of the burst cap (20) to the bottom (21) so that the igniter compartment side bursting pressure required to destroy the burst cap (20) is lower than the sum of the maximum filling pressure (PFmax) and the filling pressure (PF). The invention further relates to a burst cap, an airbag module, a vehicle safety system as well as a method of manufacturing a burst cap.