Burst Power Dithering for RF Amplifier Saturation Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face challenges in detecting and avoiding non-linear operation of RF power amplifiers, which can lead to signal distortion and spectral regrowth, especially in modulation schemes with non-constant envelopes, requiring additional hardware and increasing system costs.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to detect saturation by measuring signal parameters at the receiver using a dithering technique that applies known differences in transmit power, allowing the receiver to determine if the received difference is within a specified amount, and adjust transmission characteristics to avoid saturation, such as changing to a lower symbol rate or more robust coding schemes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current sensing techniques, correlation methods, or subsampling techniques are used to detect non-linearity, then detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity and cost increase due to specialized hardware requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-linearity detection accuracyVSAvoidspecialized hardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing receiver's signal processing capabilities to detect non-linearity by analyzing received signal characteristics, eliminating the need for specialized detection hardware at the transmitter. The receiver performs self-diagnosis of the transmitter's operational state through standard signal measurement techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of placing detection hardware at the transmitter (traditional approach), the invention inverts the detection location to the receiver. The receiver measures signal parameters and sends feedback to the transmitter, reversing the conventional detection architecture and eliminating complex transmitter hardware requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If additional hardware is added at the outdoor unit or data channel to measure transmitted power, then saturation detection capability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaturation detection capabilityVSAvoidadditional hardware at outdoor unit
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver performs multiple functions: it receives and decodes signals, measures signal parameters for saturation detection, and provides feedback to the transmitter. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated saturation detection hardware at the outdoor unit, as the receiver's existing capabilities are leveraged for dual purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses the received signal itself as an intermediary carrier of saturation information. Instead of adding hardware to directly measure transmitter output, the system embeds saturation detection capability within the normal signal reception process, using the signal as a mediator to convey operational status information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If dithering technique with known power differences is used, then saturation detection precision is improved, but transmission protocol complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaturation detection precisionVSAvoidtransmission protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies periodic dithering to the transmit power with known differences between power levels. This periodic variation allows the receiver to distinguish between normal signal variations and saturation effects by comparing expected versus actual received power differences, improving detection precision through rhythmic testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The dithering technique applies partial power variations (not full power swings) to detect saturation. By using moderate power differences that are sufficient to reveal non-linearity but not excessive enough to cause significant distortion or require complex compensation, the system achieves good detection precision with minimal protocol overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2036285B1Remote non-linearity detection via burst power dithering
Publication Date: 2016.08.24 VIASAT INC
  • EP2036285B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2036285B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2036285B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Nonlinearity characterization that transmits bursts of information where symbols vary by a value Delta. The bursts can be bursts of a constant power, followed by another burst of a different constant power. An alternative burst system uses interleaved power symbols, where some symbols in a single burst are at the first power and others are at the second power. The signal-to-noise ratio of the two groups of symbols is estimated, and the difference is used to determine whether or not to reduce the amount of saturation in the transmitter.