Burst Suppression EEG Analysis for Inferring Underlying Brain States

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The scientific understanding of brain states during anesthesia, particularly burst suppression, is lacking, and existing methods fail to accurately discern or predict current and future states based on EEG data, complicating anesthetic administration.

Innovation Solution

Analyze spatial and temporal brain activity patterns across the human cortex using multiple cortical sites to identify and characterize burst suppression states, providing insights into neural circuit dysfunction and improving monitoring and treatment guidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional EEG monitoring methods are used to assess brain states during anesthesia, then the monitoring system is simple and easy to operate, but the measurement precision and ability to accurately discern brain states is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of brain state determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the continuous EEG signal into distinct burst and suppression epochs, allowing separate analysis of each state. This segmentation enables precise characterization of brain activity patterns during burst suppression without requiring complex continuous analysis algorithms throughout the entire signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent leverages the periodic nature of burst suppression patterns by analyzing transitions between burst and suppression states. By focusing on these periodic transitions and their characteristics, the system achieves accurate brain state assessment using relatively simple temporal analysis methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If detailed analysis of burst suppression patterns is performed to improve brain state prediction, then the predictive accuracy improves, but the analysis time and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of future state predictionVSAvoidtime for data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of EEG epochs into burst and suppression categories using relatively simple criteria. This preliminary action prepares the data structure in advance, enabling faster subsequent analysis of transitions and patterns without requiring complex real-time computation during critical decision-making periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent focuses analysis on key transitional periods between burst and suppression states rather than continuously analyzing every moment of the EEG signal. By concentrating computational resources on these critical transition points, the system achieves reliable prediction accuracy while minimizing overall analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If spatial patterns across multiple cortical sites are analyzed to improve understanding of neural circuit dysfunction, then the diagnostic capability improves, but the device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic capability for neural circuit dysfunctionVSAvoidcomplexity of multi-site monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cortical monitoring into multiple discrete sites, each independently analyzing burst suppression patterns. This segmentation allows diagnostic information to be gathered from multiple locations without requiring complex integration algorithms, as each site provides independent spatial information about neural circuit function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the same burst suppression analysis methodology universally across multiple cortical sites. This universal approach enables the system to assess different neural circuits using identical processing methods, providing versatile diagnostic capability without increasing computational complexity through multiple specialized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12369856B2Systems and methods to infer brain state during burst suppression
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORP
  • US12369856B2 patent drawing
  • US12369856B2 patent drawing
  • US12369856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for monitoring a subject, and particularly, for inferring an underlying brain state present in absence of current conditions. In some aspects, a method for monitoring the subject is provided including steps of receiving physiological feedback from at least one sensor configured to acquire physiological information from locations associated with a subject's brain, assembling a set of time-series data using the received physiological feedback, and identifying portions of the set of time-series data that indicate a burst suppression state. The method also includes identifying a burst characteristic profile associated with a burst pattern determined from the identified portions, and comparing the burst characteristic against a reference set of burst profiles. The method further includes determining, based on the comparison, a likelihood of a brain state of the subject underlying the burst suppression state, and generating a report indicative of the likelihood of the determined brain state.