Bus System Self-Addressing via Current Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bus system addressing methods face challenges such as complex wiring, service inconvenience, and potential malfunctions due to plug coding, especially when actuator devices are replaced, and require sensitive current detection with high circuit complexities.

Innovation Solution

The method involves connecting the bus line to one potential of the operating voltage, allowing participants to pull the line to a reference potential, with current detection by a detector, and sequential switching until the last participant is reached, enabling address allocation with a higher static sum current and reducing detector sensitivity requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If programming addresses during manufacturing is used, then addressing is reliable, but service inconvenience and logistics complexity increase when participants need replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaddressing reliabilityVSAvoidservice convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-addressing of participants automatically during initialization. Each participant is equipped with a unique identifier (such as serial number or hardware address) that is automatically detected by the control unit and assigned as the participant's address, eliminating the need for manual programming or pre-programmed components. This allows participants to be dynamically addressed even after replacement without requiring service personnel to reprogram them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If plug coding is used for address assignment, then addressing can be changed, but malfunctions may occur and wiring complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaddress changeabilityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical plug coding systems with an electronic/software-based addressing mechanism. Instead of physically coding addresses through plug configurations, the system uses electronic identification (such as serial numbers stored in memory or hardware addresses) that can be read and processed electronically by the control unit. This substitution eliminates the reliability issues associated with mechanical plug coding while maintaining the ability to assign and change addresses dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Extent of automation

If switches are used for self-addressing by serially separating bus connections, then automatic addressing is achieved, but electrical disconnection of bus line and large space requirement occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic addressingVSAvoidbus system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the addressing function from the physical bus connection structure. Instead of using switches to serially separate bus connections for addressing, the system separates the addressing identification (participant identifier) from the communication bus. Each participant maintains continuous connection to the bus while being identified by a unique marker, allowing automatic addressing without physically disconnecting or rearranging bus connections. This eliminates the need for complex switch matrices and reduces space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Extent of automation

If measuring current is impressed to detect voltage drops for addressing, then participants can be identified sequentially, but high circuit complexities and programming effort are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic addressingVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simplified identification mechanism where each participant carries a unique identifier (such as a serial number or hardware address) that serves as a copy of their identity. Instead of using complex voltage drop measurements across resistors, the control unit directly reads these unique identifiers from the participants during initialization. This copying approach replaces the complex measuring current and voltage drop detection method with a straightforward identification and registration process, significantly reducing circuit complexity and programming requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for more robust and cost-effective address allocation with increased useful signal detection, reducing the need for sensitive detectors and additional components, and can be implemented with minimal modification to existing bus systems.

Implementation Method 1

a current is detectable by a detector arranged in the bus line and associated with the participant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS7590140B2Method for addressing the participants of a bus system
Publication Date: 2009.09.15 ELMOS SEMICON AG
  • US7590140B2 patent drawing
  • US7590140B2 patent drawing
  • US7590140B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In the method for addressing the participants of a bus system, the central control unit connects the bus line to one potential of the operating voltage, while each participant tries to pull the bus line to a reference potential, normally the operating voltage, wherein, due to the current source behavior of the switch placing the bus to the operating voltage, a current is detectable by a detector arranged in the bus line and associated with the participant. When the participant detects this decrease of current, said participant switches off its switch. Due to time-defined slow connection of the switched current sources, this process takes place sequentially within a group of participants until the last participant is reached. The detector associated with this participant does in no case detect a current, such that, after elapse of a predeterminable on-period, the switch of this participant is still open. Thus one of the participants from the group of all participants is specified such that an address can now be allocated to this participant. During further addressing cycles the remaining participants are subjected to the same process, wherein the switch of the participant already addressed remains open all the time.