Parallel Sub-Bar Bus Bar Layout for Transformer AC Loss Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Low-voltage DC-DC converters in eco-friendly vehicles experience significant AC loss due to high currents flowing through small-turn windings, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs, particularly in bus bars used in transformers.

Innovation Solution

A bus bar structure comprising multiple sub-bars arranged horizontally and connected in parallel, with varying widths to match resistances and impedances, minimizing AC loss while maintaining a core size and reducing manufacturing costs through an optimized design method that calculates sub-bar dimensions to achieve balanced current distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a bus bar with small number of turns is used in low-voltage high-current transformer, then the transformer structure is simplified and manufacturing cost is reduced, but AC loss increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidAC loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The bus bar is divided into multiple sub-bars (first sub-bar, second sub-bar, third sub-bar, etc.) arranged in parallel. Each sub-bar carries a portion of the total current, and by optimizing their individual dimensions and arrangements, the AC loss is reduced while maintaining the simplified bus bar structure without requiring expensive Litz wires.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sub-bars are designed with different width dimensions adapted to their specific positions and current carrying requirements. The width of each sub-bar is optimized based on its location within the transformer core window, allowing local optimization of current distribution and AC loss reduction while maintaining overall structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If the width of sub-bars is made uniform, then manufacturing is simplified, but current distribution becomes uneven leading to increased AC loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidAC loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The sub-bars are designed with asymmetric width dimensions where each sub-bar has a different width optimized for its specific position and current carrying requirements. This asymmetric design ensures optimal current distribution across all sub-bars, minimizing AC loss while the widths are carefully controlled to remain within manufacturing tolerances for cost-effective production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Loss of energy

If more sub-bars are added to reduce AC loss, then AC loss decreases, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAC lossVSAvoidbus bar structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using an excessive number of sub-bars which would increase complexity, the invention uses a optimized number of sub-bars (typically 3-5) with carefully designed dimensions. This partial action approach achieves sufficient AC loss reduction without over-complicating the bus bar structure, maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes parameters such as the number of sub-bars, their width dimensions, and spacing to achieve the best balance between AC loss reduction and structural simplicity. By carefully selecting and adjusting these parameters, the bus bar structure achieves effective AC loss minimization while maintaining manageable complexity for mass production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively minimizes AC loss, maintains uniform heat dissipation, and reduces the need for expensive Litz wires, enabling mass production of bus bars with improved efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

conduction loss may occur in a winding due to a current, and is broadly classified as DC loss and AC loss

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAC loss: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

the AC current flows through only a surface of the winding, and a depth from the surface of the winding to which a current may flow may vary according to a frequency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSkin effect: Skin Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11990270B2Bus bar for minimizing AC loss in transformer and method of designing the same
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 HYUNDAI MOBIS CO LTD
  • US11990270B2 patent drawing
  • US11990270B2 patent drawing
  • US11990270B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aspect of the present disclosure provides a bus bar as a winding in a core of a transformer includes multiple sub-bars arranged horizontally and connected in parallel so as to minimize an AC current in the transformer, and the sub-bars have different widths and thus resistances or impedances with respect to a current flowing through the sub-bars are the same. Another aspect of the present disclosure provides a method of designing a bus bar for resistance or impedance matching between multiple sub-bars included in the bus bar to share a current to minimize an AC current in the transformer. Another aspect of the present disclosure provides a transformer, for a DC-DC converter for use in a vehicle, which is manufactured by the method of designing a bus bar.