Butadiene Extraction Tar Control via Solvent Reclamation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing solvent extraction processes for butadiene from hydrocarbon mixtures face challenges in controlling tar formation and deposition, which leads to equipment plugging and increased maintenance costs, despite maintaining high tar levels as per industry standards.

Innovation Solution

Maintaining tar levels below 1.6 wt.% in the solvent mixture and reducing the total tar and secondary solvent content to less than 5 wt.% in the butadiene extraction system, achieved through alterations in the solvent reclamation system, including cooling the secondary solvent stream before injection and altering the solvent reclamation unit operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high tar levels (not less than 2 wt.%) are maintained in the solvent mixture as per industry standards, then tar formation control is supposed to be achieved, but tar deposition and equipment plugging actually increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetar formation controlVSAvoidtar deposition
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the critical parameter of tar content from the conventional minimum 2 wt.% to a maximum of less than 1.6 wt.%. This parameter inversion resolves the contradiction by demonstrating that lower tar levels, contrary to industry dogma, actually prevent tar deposition and equipment plugging while maintaining reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies inversion by completely reversing the conventional approach: instead of maintaining high tar levels to control tar formation, it maintains low tar levels to achieve the same effect. This inverted approach breaks the harmful cycle where high tar levels lead to more deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If tar level is maintained at not less than 2 wt.% and total tar plus secondary solvent at 5 wt.%, then operating specifications are met, but equipment requires frequent shutdown and clean out

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating specification complianceVSAvoidmaintenance shutdown time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating parameters from the conventional tar level of 2-5 wt.% to a reduced level of less than 1.6 wt.%. This parameter change eliminates the need for frequent maintenance shutdowns while still meeting operational requirements, thereby reducing time loss without sacrificing ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

By maintaining low tar levels, the system becomes self-cleaning and resistant to tar deposition, reducing the need for external maintenance interventions and shutdowns. The process naturally prevents tar accumulation rather than requiring periodic cleanup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of substance

If conventional solvent reclamation operation is used, then solvent is recovered, but tar accumulates and causes deposition in equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolvent recoveryVSAvoidtar accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the solvent reclamation operation by changing the parameter of tar content from accepting conventional levels to actively maintaining levels below 1.6 wt.%. This change prevents tar accumulation during solvent recovery while still achieving effective solvent reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control in the solvent reclamation system by monitoring and adjusting tar levels to maintain them below the 1.6 wt.% threshold. This feedback mechanism ensures that solvent recovery operations do not lead to tar accumulation that would cause equipment deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a self-cleaning extraction system with reduced tar formation and deposition, increased operational time between maintenance shutdowns, lower energy costs, and reduced solvent loss, effectively addressing the tar-related issues in butadiene extraction.

Implementation Method 1

a primary solvent and a secondary solvent which, when mixed together, form a solvent mixture that is effective for the extraction of butadiene from a crude C4 stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComplexing: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

maintaining the level of tars in the solvent mixture circulating in the system at not greater than about 1.6 wt. %

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS7348466B2Solvent extraction
Publication Date: 2008.03.25 EQUISTAR CHEMICALS LP
  • US7348466B2 patent drawing
  • US7348466B2 patent drawing
  • US7348466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for the solvent extraction of butadiene from a mixture of hydrocarbons having four carbon atoms per molecule, which method inherently produces tars, the extraction process is operated with a tar loading level, relative to the solvent employed, of no more than about 1.6 wt. %.