Butterfly Hinge Key Mechanism for Low-Profile Tactile Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic devices, such as keyboards, face challenges in minimizing size and manufacturing costs due to the large space occupied by input devices, which can be alleviated by reducing the z-stackup of key mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a butterfly hinge-based key mechanism that allows for low travel distances with a desired tactile response, utilizing a double wing design and pivot pins to minimize keystroke depth while maintaining consistent tactile feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If traditional key mechanisms are used, then tactile response is achieved, but z-stackup height is large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvez-stackup heightVSAvoidtactile response
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The key mechanism is divided into separate functional components: a scissor mechanism for vertical motion, a butterfly hinge for rotational motion, and a dome switch for actuation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, achieving low profile height while maintaining tactile feedback through the specialized dome switch component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism transitions from purely vertical motion to a combination of vertical and rotational motion. The butterfly hinge introduces rotational movement as an additional dimension, allowing the keycap to pivot while descending, thereby reducing the vertical travel distance needed to achieve the same actuation effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If key mechanism size is reduced, then device size is minimized, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey mechanism volumeVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functions are merged into integrated components. The scissor mechanism and butterfly hinge are combined into a single assembly that works together to achieve both compact size and low profile. The dome switch serves multiple purposes: providing tactile feedback, actuating the switch, and defining the key travel distance, thereby reducing the need for separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The butterfly hinge serves multiple functions: it enables rotational motion, provides structural support, and works in conjunction with the scissor mechanism to achieve the low profile configuration. This multi-functionality reduces the total number of components needed, simplifying manufacturing despite the reduced size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Length of moving object

If keystroke distance is reduced, then device thickness is minimized, but tactile feedback consistency becomes difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekeystroke distanceVSAvoidtactile feedback consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanism changes the motion parameters from pure vertical translation to a combination of vertical and rotational motion. The butterfly hinge introduces a rotational component that allows the keycap to pivot during actuation, maintaining tactile feedback through the angular movement while reducing the vertical travel distance required to actuate the dome switch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The butterfly hinge acts as an intermediary between the keycap and the dome switch. It translates the user's pressing motion into a controlled rotational and vertical movement that consistently actuates the dome switch at the correct point, ensuring uniform tactile feedback across all keys regardless of variations in pressing force or angle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the creation of thinner keyboards with uniform tactile response across the keycap surface, reducing keystroke distance to between 0.1 mm to 2.0 mm, and maintaining stability and tactile feel over the device's lifetime.

Implementation Method 1

each wing is operative to pivot about its own pivot axis during a keystroke of the key mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivoting: Hinge

Implementation Method 2

a dome switch is secured within the cavity between the keycap assembly and the support structure, the dome switch operative to bias the keycap assembly in a first position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical biasing: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10699856B2Low-travel key mechanisms using butterfly hinges
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 APPLE INC
  • US10699856B2 patent drawing
  • US10699856B2 patent drawing
  • US10699856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A key mechanism including one or more butterfly hinges. Each butterfly hinge may include a double wing design operative to move between a depressed position and non-depressed position. Hinged coupling mechanisms couple respective arms of the wings together. Additionally or alternatively, a key mechanism can include one or more half-butterfly hinges. Each half-butterfly hinge includes a double wing design operative to move between a depressed position and non-depressed position. A hinged coupling mechanism couples one set of corresponding arms of the wings together, while the other set of corresponding arms are not coupled together.