Buy Order Back Out Methods for Cash Sufficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Portfolio management systems face challenges in executing buy orders when there is insufficient actual or expected cash, leading to the need for canceling or reducing buy orders, which can result in suboptimal trading proposals.

Innovation Solution

The system implements various back out methods such as Best Fit, Random, Pro-Rate, Order of Descending Quantity, Order of Ascending Quantity, and Factor of Safety to automatically modify buy orders based on available cash, ensuring that buy orders are reduced or canceled in a way that maximizes the chances of a successful trading proposal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sell orders are blocked to prevent insufficient cash, then cash sufficiency is improved, but trading execution capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecash sufficiencyVSAvoidtrading execution capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of buy orders that should be backed out before cash insufficiency occurs. By proactively analyzing the trade order set and identifying which buy orders to reduce or cancel in advance, the system prevents cash insufficiency while maintaining trading execution capability through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If buy orders are canceled or reduced to ensure cash sufficiency, then cash sufficiency is improved, but trading proposal quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecash sufficiencyVSAvoidtrading proposal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the identification of buy orders for backing out is based on analyzing the complete trade order set and cash availability. The system continuously monitors and adjusts the back out decisions to optimize the trading proposal quality while ensuring cash sufficiency, using feedback from cash position and order characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustment of buy orders is performed, then trading proposal quality can be optimized, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading proposal qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically identifying which buy orders should be backed out without requiring manual intervention. The automated identification process analyzes the trade order set, determines cash requirements, and selects appropriate buy orders for reduction or cancellation, thereby optimizing trading proposal quality while minimizing processing time losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7797224B2Systems and methods for automatically backing out by orders
Publication Date: 2010.09.14 TEGRA118 WEALTH SOLUTIONS INC
  • US7797224B2 patent drawing
  • US7797224B2 patent drawing
  • US7797224B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for identifying a candidate set of one or more buy orders associated with an investment account, ordering the buy orders in the candidate set into a chain, determining a back out target value that identifies a fiscal amount by which the candidate set must be reduced, and decrementing an initial asset quantity of one or more successive non-zero quantity buy orders in the chain by a fixed integer quantity to a final asset quantity until the back out target value is achieved. The candidate set of buy orders can then be modified by replacing the respective initial asset quantity with the respective final asset quantity for at least one of the one or more buy orders. The modified candidate set of buy orders can then be provided for trade execution.