BWR Steam Dryer Acoustic Load Prediction via Scale Model Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for predicting acoustic loads on BWR steam dryers are inaccurate, expensive, and lack plant-specific data, leading to potential damage and high repair costs due to vibration and cracking issues.

Innovation Solution

A scale model of the BWR steam system is used with a test fixture to generate airflow and measure system behavior, employing scaling relationships derived from dimensional analysis to predict acoustic loads and validate plant conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If in-vessel instrumentation programs are used to measure acoustic loads, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic load measurementVSAvoidinstrumentation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a scaled-down replica (1:4 scale) of the steam dryer and conducts tests outside the reactor vessel. This copy allows measurement of acoustic loads with full instrumentation capability while avoiding the complexity and cost constraints of in-vessel measurement. The scaled model preserves the acoustic characteristics of the full-scale system through proper scaling relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Device complexity

If empirical generic load estimates are used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and plant-specific accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting systemVSAvoidacoustic load prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the testing approach by changing the scale parameter (using a 1:4 scale model) and conducting tests under controlled conditions outside the reactor. This allows use of simple testing equipment while achieving plant-specific accuracy through proper scaling of acoustic parameters and geometry, avoiding both the complexity of in-vessel instrumentation and the inaccuracy of generic estimates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If acoustic circuit models are used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to thermal gradients and verification difficulties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling systemVSAvoidload prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of relying on complex acoustic circuit models with unverified assumptions about thermal gradients and pressure oscillations, the patent creates a physical scaled model that directly replicates the steam dryer geometry and acoustic characteristics. This allows direct measurement of acoustic loads under controlled conditions, providing reliable plant-specific data without the verification problems of analytical models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If CFD analyses are performed, then measurement precision may be improved, but use of energy and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic load predictionVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a physical scaled model to directly measure acoustic loads through simple instrumentation, avoiding the need for computationally intensive CFD analyses. The scaled model approach provides accurate plant-specific data with minimal computational resources, as the physical experiment directly captures the acoustic phenomena without requiring complex numerical simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate, cost-effective prediction of acoustic loads on BWR steam dryers, enabling utilities to identify potential issues before operation, reducing the risk of damage and repair costs while providing more comprehensive data than existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

a test fixture configured to generate air flow in the scale model

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirflow generation:

Implementation Method 2

one or more measurement devices for monitoring the behavior of the system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic load detection: Acoustic Radiation Pressure

Implementation Method 3

the aero-acoustic loading of the steam dryer can result in vibration of the steam dryer during operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 4

employing scaling relationships derived from dimensional analysis to predict acoustic loads and validate plant conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDimensional analysis scaling:

Data Source

PatentUS8948334B2System and method for testing the steam system of a boiling water reactor
Publication Date: 2015.02.03 GE HITACHI NUCLEAR ENERGY AMERICAS LLC
  • US8948334B2 patent drawing
  • US8948334B2 patent drawing
  • US8948334B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for predicting acoustic loads expected on a boiling water reactor (BWR) may include a BWR scale model, a test fixture for generating air flow in the scale model, and one or measurement devices for monitoring system behavior to predict how acoustic loads may affect plant operation for the BWR being evaluated.