Byte Interleaving Synchronization for Periodic Communication Blockages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Communication terminals experience periodic blockages due to rotating blades, leading to corrupted data and increased bandwidth and processing requirements for error corrections or retransmissions.

Innovation Solution

Synchronize code block and interleaver boundaries at the byte level to minimize acquisition time, using local interleaving techniques with byte interleavers to recover performance loss and enhance communication throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If byte interleaving is used to speed up processing, then processing speed is improved, but LDPC erasure code decoding performance degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddecoding performance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the interleaving process into two distinct stages: byte-level interleaving for speed and bit-level local interleaving for performance preservation. The byte interleaver operates on entire bytes to maximize processing speed, while the local interleaver operates on individual bits within each byte to maintain decoding performance. This segmentation allows each stage to optimize for its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different interleaving qualities to different parts of the data structure. Byte-level interleaving provides coarse-grained reordering for speed, while bit-level local interleaving provides fine-grained reordering within each byte for performance. This local quality approach ensures that the critical bit-level relationships needed for decoding are preserved while still benefiting from byte-level processing speedups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of time

If synchronization is not performed, then acquisition time is reduced, but communication reliability deteriorates due to periodic blockages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition timeVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary synchronization actions by aligning code block boundaries with interleaver boundaries before data transmission begins. This preliminary alignment ensures that when periodic blockages occur, the synchronization structure is already in place to handle them efficiently, reducing the need for time-consuming re-synchronization during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic synchronization markers within the data stream that occur at regular intervals corresponding to the interleaver duration. These periodic markers allow the receiver to maintain synchronization throughout transmission, automatically recovering from periodic blockages without significant loss of time or reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12407445B2Systems and methods for improving communication throughput
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 HUGHES NETWORK SYST
  • US12407445B2 patent drawing
  • US12407445B2 patent drawing
  • US12407445B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Communication terminals, systems and methods are disclosed herein. In an embodiment, a method for improving communication throughput when experiencing periodic blockages includes generating at least one outer code block including a plurality of sync data elements, writing the sync data elements from the at least one outer code block to a same column of at least one interleaver including a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns, and writing additional data elements from the outer code block to other columns of the at least one interleaver.