Bytecode Concurrent Interval Execution for Processor Parallelism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dynamically typed languages like Javascript and Python, which use interpreters to execute bytecodes, often fail to fully utilize out-of-order execution resources of processors due to sequential fetching of instructions, even when out-of-order execution is supported, leading to inefficient utilization of processor capabilities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing concurrent interval execution (cointerval) within a single thread, using additional hardware structures such as next instruction pointer storage, queue structures, and a cointerval register file, to enable simultaneous execution of independent subsets of instructions within a main code sequence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sequential fetching of bytecode handlers is used, then instruction correctness is maintained, but processor efficiency deteriorates due to underutilization of out-of-order execution resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction correctnessVSAvoidprocessor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the bytecode execution into multiple independent intervals that can be fetched and executed concurrently. Instead of treating the entire bytecode handler sequence as a single sequential unit, it divides them into separate fetchable intervals that can be processed in parallel by the out-of-order execution engine, thereby improving processor efficiency while maintaining correctness through proper interval management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of parallelism at the bytecode interval level, transitioning from traditional single-threaded sequential execution to multi-interval concurrent execution. This dimensional change allows multiple bytecode intervals to coexist in different execution stages simultaneously, fully utilizing the processor's out-of-order execution capabilities without compromising instruction correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If concurrent interval execution is implemented, then instruction-level parallelism is enhanced, but device complexity increases due to additional hardware structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction-level parallelismVSAvoidhardware structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the concurrent interval execution hardware structures to serve multiple functions. The interval management mechanisms not only enable parallel execution but also handle interval scheduling, dependency tracking, and synchronization. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated hardware components for each function, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while achieving enhanced instruction-level parallelism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If bytecode handlers are executed sequentially, then hardware resource requirements are minimized, but execution time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware resource requirementsVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent ensures continuous utilization of processor resources by maintaining multiple bytecode intervals in different execution stages simultaneously. Instead of having idle periods between sequential handler executions, the out-of-order execution engine keeps execution units busy by fetching and executing independent intervals in parallel, thereby reducing total execution time without significantly increasing hardware resource requirements through efficient resource sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260064420A1Providing bytecode-level parallelism in a processor using concurrent interval execution
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 INTEL CORP
  • US20260064420A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064420A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064420A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, an apparatus comprises: a first plurality of registers to store information of at least a main sequence; a second plurality of registers to store information of at least one concurrent interval, the at least one concurrent interval independent of the main sequence, where the second plurality of registers are accessible only by instructions of the at least one concurrent interval and the first plurality of registers are accessible by instructions of the main sequence and the at least one concurrent interval; and an execution circuit coupled to the first register file and the second register file, the execution circuit to execute the instructions of the main sequence and the at least one concurrent interval. Other embodiments are described and claimed.