C-GRC Controller Automating Agricultural Compliance Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural safety control systems face challenges in monitoring and demonstrating compliance across various segments of an agricultural operation, especially as technology reduces human interaction, leading to a need for automated data collection and traceability of agricultural products.

Innovation Solution

A Centralized Governance Regulatory Compliance (C-GRC) controller is introduced to dynamically monitor and collate data, automate compliance plan governance, and maintain traceability through cryptographic key exchanges and Radio Frequency (RF) tags, ensuring compliance with agricultural safety requirements across the agricultural cycle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual data collection by personnel is used to verify compliance, then compliance monitoring can be performed, but labor intensity and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-monitoring of compliance through sensors, RFID tags, and blockchain technology. Data is automatically collected, verified, and recorded without human intervention, allowing the system to serve itself in terms of compliance monitoring while reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical data collection processes are replaced with automated electronic systems including sensors, RFID readers, and blockchain smart contracts. This substitution eliminates the need for personnel to manually verify compliance while maintaining or enhancing monitoring reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If technology streamlines agricultural operations to reduce human interaction, then productivity increases, but compliance traceability and data collection become more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcompliance data traceability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors automatically monitor operational parameters, blockchain records all transactions and compliance data immutably, and the system provides real-time verification. This ensures that as automation increases, compliance information is systematically captured and traceable without loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Blockchain technology serves as an intermediary layer between automated operational systems and compliance verification requirements. It automatically captures, stores, and verifies compliance data generated by streamlined operations, preventing information loss while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If automated monitoring systems are implemented across all agricultural segments, then compliance accuracy improves, but system complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance measurement accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance monitoring system is divided into modular segments corresponding to different agricultural operations (planting, growth, harvesting, storage). Each segment has dedicated sensors and blockchain smart contracts that independently monitor specific compliance requirements, improving measurement precision while managing complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blockchain infrastructure provides universal functionality across all agricultural segments, serving as a common platform for data recording, verification, and traceability. This multi-functional approach allows different sensors and monitoring devices to integrate with a single standardized system, reducing overall complexity while maintaining high compliance measurement accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The C-GRC controller provides a granular record of agricultural activities, verifies the chain of custody, and ensures compliance with safety rules, enhancing the integrity and health monitoring of agricultural products from seed management to shipment, thereby improving agricultural safety and quality control.

Implementation Method 1

maintain traceability through cryptographic key exchanges and Radio Frequency (RF) tags

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio Frequency: Electromagnetic Propulsion

Data Source

PatentUS11922521B2Centralized governance regulatory compliance (C-GRC) system
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 IUNU INC
  • US11922521B2 patent drawing
  • US11922521B2 patent drawing
  • US11922521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure describes techniques that facilitate a Governance Regulatory Compliance (C-GRC) controller that is configured to dynamically monitor and collate data associated with an agricultural operation for demonstrating compliance with an agricultural compliance plan. The C-GRC controller may act as a centralized server that dynamically monitors the cycle of agricultural activities for an agricultural product and in doing so, automates the governance of an agricultural compliance plan across a plurality of entities that are each responsible for one or more agricultural activities. The C-GRC controller may detect independent interactions conducted between a complying entity and a participating entity. These interactions may be intended to gather information relating to compliance of a pending task. In doing so, the C-GRC controller may update an agricultural compliance plan accordingly. The C-GRC controller may dynamically advance progress through an agricultural compliance plan or dynamically regress progress based on a complying entity retracting compliance.