C-Shaped Lock Retainer for Earth-Working Tools

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing retainer systems for ground engaging tools on earth-working machines face issues with secure attachment and detachment, as well as increased friction due to work material accumulation, which affects the longevity and efficiency of the tools.

Innovation Solution

A retainer system comprising a lock and retainer bushing with a C-shaped configuration and detent projections/recesses, allowing for secure attachment and detachment of ground engaging tools by rotating the lock, and features like a helical surface or eccentric design to reduce friction from work material accumulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional pin-based locking system is used to attach ground engaging tools, then the attachment is secure, but the system complexity increases and detachment becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidretainer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer system is divided into separate functional components: a body with a cavity, a lock that rotates within the cavity, and a tool with a post. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while simplifying the overall assembly and detachment process compared to traditional multi-part pin-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lock is designed to rotate dynamically between locked and unlocked positions. In the locked position, the lock engages with the post to secure the tool. In the unlocked position, the lock disengages to allow tool removal. This dynamic rotation mechanism replaces static pin-based systems, reducing complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If work material accumulates in the retainer system, then the attachment remains secure, but friction increases affecting tool longevity and efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidtool efficiency and longevity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The design extracts the work material from the critical friction zones between moving parts. The C-shaped portion of the lock and the detent mechanism are positioned to minimize contact with accumulated material, allowing the material to be excluded from areas that would generate excessive friction and wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The surface geometry of the lock and cavity is modified with specific contours and angles that change the friction parameters. The C-shaped portion and detent projections are designed with optimized contact surfaces that reduce coefficient of friction even when material is present, thereby protecting tool longevity while maintaining attachment security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8950092B2Retainer systems for ground engaging tools
Publication Date: 2015.02.10 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US8950092B2 patent drawing
  • US8950092B2 patent drawing
  • US8950092B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are various exemplary embodiments of a lock for a ground engaging tool. The lock may include a head portion and a C-shaped portion extending from the head portion. The C-shaped portion may include an inner surface extending between a first circumferential end and a second circumferential end to define a lock slot. The inner surface may include a first inner surface extending from the first circumferential end to a midpoint between the first circumferential end and the second circumferential end and a second inner surface extending from the second circumferential end to the midpoint. The first inner surface and the second inner surface may be symmetrical with respect to a first plane substantially parallel to a lock rotation axis. On a plane substantially perpendicular to the lock rotation axis, a distance between the first circumferential end and the second circumferential end may be less than a maximum distance between the first inner surface and the second inner surface in a direction perpendicular to the first plane.