In-Cabin Camera Hand Detection for ADAS Hazard Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for a reliable system to detect whether a vehicle driver is in control of the steering wheel, particularly in hazardous conditions, to prevent accidents caused by driver misuse of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and to comply with regulatory mandates that require detection of driver control to prevent misuse.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle vision system utilizing interior cabin cameras and a GPS sensor to monitor the driver's hands and position, generating alerts through a combination of visual and auditory warnings if the driver's hands are not on the steering wheel, especially when approaching hazardous locations, using image processing and 3D reconstruction techniques to ensure accurate detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If driver monitoring systems are implemented to detect driver control, then driver safety and compliance are improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is divided into multiple independent camera units positioned at different locations within the vehicle cabin. Each camera captures specific zones (steering wheel area, driver's hands, driver's face), and the system processes these segmented views separately before integrating the information to determine driver control status. This modular approach improves detection reliability while managing system complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The camera system serves multiple functions: detecting hand position on the steering wheel, monitoring driver facial expressions for attentiveness, tracking driver gestures, and determining overall driver control status. By making the imaging system multi-functional, the patent reduces the need for separate specialized sensors for each monitoring task, thereby improving driver safety without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple cameras are used to accurately detect driver hand position, then detection precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand position detection precisionVSAvoidcamera system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different camera units are positioned to optimize capture of specific local areas: one camera focuses on the steering wheel and driver's hands, another on the driver's face, and a third on the overall cabin. Each camera is configured with appropriate field-of-view and focal characteristics for its specific monitoring zone, improving hand position detection precision while avoiding the complexity of using a single complex multi-functional camera system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs image processing algorithms and control unit logic as intermediaries that fuse data from multiple camera sources. Rather than requiring direct mechanical or optical complexity in the camera hardware, the system uses software-based image fusion and analysis to achieve precise hand position detection from multiple simpler camera inputs, thereby improving measurement precision without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If real-time image processing is performed to monitor driver behavior, then response time is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs image processing at optimized intervals rather than continuously, analyzing frames at rates sufficient to detect driver control status changes and hazardous conditions while allowing periodic idle states. This periodic processing approach maintains adequate response time for safety-critical detections while reducing average energy consumption compared to continuous real-time processing of all captured frames.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The image processing system applies selective analysis depth: full processing is applied only when potential hazards are detected or when driver control status is uncertain, while routine monitoring uses lighter processing. This partial action approach ensures rapid response to critical events while minimizing energy consumption during normal stable driving conditions, balancing response time requirements with energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11745755B2Vehicular driving assist system with driver monitoring
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC
  • US11745755B2 patent drawing
  • US11745755B2 patent drawing
  • US11745755B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicular driving assist system includes an in-cabin camera disposed at an interior rearview mirror assembly in an interior cabin of a vehicle and viewing at least a steering wheel of the vehicle and capturing image data. An electronic control unit (ECU) includes an image processor for processing image data captured by the in-cabin camera to detect presence of one or both hands of a driver of the vehicle at the steering wheel. The vehicular driving assist system, responsive to determining, via processing at the ECU of image data captured by the in-cabin camera, that at least one hand of the driver is not on the steering wheel when the vehicle is at or approaching a hazardous condition, generates an alert to the driver of the vehicle.