In-Cabin Driver State Monitoring for Rule-Based Vehicle Warnings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle safety monitoring systems focus primarily on the driver's behavior and do not comprehensively monitor the cabin situation, failing to determine a comprehensive driver-associated state, which is crucial for ensuring safety in shared or rented vehicles and for young drivers.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method and system that utilizes sensors, including onboard cameras, to determine a driver-associated state by capturing cabin data, analyzing seating poses, interactions, and objects within the cabin, and comparing this data to predefined rules to trigger appropriate warnings and interact with vehicle control systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If current vehicle safety monitoring systems focus only on driver behavior monitoring, then the system complexity is reduced, but the comprehensiveness of driver-associated state determination is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidcomprehensiveness of driver-associated state
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the monitoring function into multiple independent sensor modules (camera, microphone, weight sensor, proximity sensor) that can be independently selected and configured. This allows the system to be divided into basic monitoring functions and advanced cabin analysis functions, enabling users to choose the appropriate level of complexity while maintaining the option for comprehensive monitoring when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional sensors that can perform multiple tasks. For example, the onboard camera not only monitors driver behavior but also detects cabin occupancy, identifies objects, and analyzes seating positions. This universal approach allows a single sensor system to provide comprehensive driver-associated state determination without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If multiple sensors are deployed to capture comprehensive cabin data, then the comprehensiveness of monitoring is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of cabin situation dataVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple sensor types (camera, microphone, weight sensor, proximity sensor) into a unified monitoring platform that processes data from all sources through a single rule evaluation engine. This consolidation approach allows comprehensive data collection while managing complexity through integrated processing rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer (the rule evaluation unit and data fusion algorithms) that mediates between the multiple sensors and the final monitoring output. This intermediary layer standardizes data from different sensor types, enabling comprehensive monitoring while shielding the user from the underlying sensor complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If comprehensive cabin monitoring is implemented, then safety monitoring effectiveness is improved, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring effectivenessVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining safety rules and thresholds before monitoring begins. The rule evaluation unit is pre-configured with safety criteria, and the system continuously compares sensor data against these pre-established rules, enabling rapid real-time assessment without requiring complex computational analysis during active monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial monitoring by focusing on specific critical parameters (driver presence, seatbelt status, number of occupants) that are most relevant to safety. Rather than analyzing every possible cabin parameter in equal detail, the system applies monitoring intensity proportional to safety criticality, reducing overall processing requirements while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4524907A1Vehicular safety monitoring
Publication Date: 2025.03.19 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • EP4524907A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4524907A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4524907A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A computerized method of vehicular safety monitoring is presented. The method comprises determining a driver-associated state based on data from one or more sensors of a vehicle, wherein at least one sensor captures a cabin of the vehicle, comparing the driver-associated state to one or more predefined rules, and in response to detection of a violation of a rule of the one or more rules, triggering a warning event.