In-Cabin Facial Tracking With Geometry-Corrected Cognitive Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies fail to effectively utilize in-cabin sensor data for real-time cognitive state analysis in vehicles, leading to potential safety issues and inefficient use of travel time, as they lack robust methods for detecting and interpreting occupant mental states and emotional cues.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a machine learning-based system that collects and analyzes in-cabin sensor data, including images and audio, to detect facial features, manipulate views based on vehicle geometry, and provide cognitive state data to applications for autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicle control and content recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If in-cabin sensor data is collected and analyzed using machine learning, then cognitive state analysis accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecognitive state analysis accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the cognitive state analysis into multiple independent processing stages: facial feature detection, view manipulation based on vehicle geometry, and cognitive state classification. Each stage is handled by separate machine learning models operating independently, allowing the complex task to be divided into manageable components that can be processed sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary view manipulation step that transforms raw sensor data into standardized facial views before cognitive state analysis. This intermediary processing layer adapts the sensor data to account for vehicle interior geometry, creating a normalized representation that improves analysis accuracy while keeping the overall system architecture modular and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If real-time facial detection is performed for each seating location, then safety monitoring coverage is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring coverageVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the vehicle interior into discrete seating location zones and assigns specific detection responsibilities to each zone. Facial detection is performed independently for each seating location using dedicated processing channels, allowing parallel execution that maintains comprehensive coverage while optimizing processing efficiency through spatial segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary view manipulation and geometric correction on sensor data before initiating full cognitive state analysis. By pre-processing the data to account for vehicle interior geometry and standardizing facial views in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during real-time analysis, thereby decreasing processing time while maintaining accurate detection across all seating locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If sensor data is collected from multiple sources, then data completeness is improved, but information processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidprocessing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple sensor sources (cameras, microphones, and other in-cabin sensors) into a unified processing pipeline. By combining these diverse data streams and applying integrated machine learning models, the system achieves comprehensive cognitive state analysis while optimizing resource utilization through consolidated processing rather than separate analysis of each sensor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal machine learning framework that processes multiple types of sensor data (visual, audio, and other physiological signals) through a single integrated cognitive state analysis system. This multi-functional approach allows the same processing infrastructure to handle diverse data types, reducing overall processing load compared to having separate specialized systems for each sensor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11935281B2Vehicular in-cabin facial tracking using machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 AFFECTIVA
  • US11935281B2 patent drawing
  • US11935281B2 patent drawing
  • US11935281B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Vehicular in-cabin facial tracking is performed using machine learning. In-cabin sensor data of a vehicle interior is collected. The in-cabin sensor data includes images of the vehicle interior. A set of seating locations for the vehicle interior is determined. The set is based on the images. The set of seating locations is scanned for performing facial detection for each of the seating locations using a facial detection model. A view of a detected face is manipulated. The manipulation is based on a geometry of the vehicle interior. Cognitive state data of the detected face is analyzed. The cognitive state data analysis is based on additional images of the detected face. The cognitive state data analysis uses the view that was manipulated. The cognitive state data analysis is promoted to a using application. The using application provides vehicle manipulation information to the vehicle. The manipulation information is for an autonomous vehicle.