Aircraft Cabin Fault Location GUI via Distributed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft cabin control systems operate independently for environmental and passenger comfort functions, lacking flexibility and consolidation, which limits the ability to efficiently manage cabin settings from a centralized or user-friendly interface.

Innovation Solution

A distributed architecture with a crew IO node and passenger IO node system, utilizing touch-sensitive interfaces and mobile devices, allows for centralized control of environmental and comfort functions, including lighting, temperature, entertainment, and seating, through a unified graphical user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If environmental and passenger comfort functions are controlled independently through separate systems, then system reliability is maintained, but device complexity increases and ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecabin control operationVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges environmental control functions and passenger comfort control functions into a single unified graphical user interface displayed on a mobile device. This consolidation allows crew members to access and control both types of functions through one interface rather than separate systems, improving ease of operation while the modular architecture maintains system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified graphical user interface serves multiple functions by providing control over both environmental parameters (temperature, lighting) and passenger comfort settings (seat positioning, entertainment) through a single platform. This multi-functional approach reduces the number of separate control systems needed while maintaining comprehensive control capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If control functions are consolidated into a unified interface, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecabin control operationVSAvoidcontrol system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile device with graphical user interface acts as an intermediary between the control systems and the user. It provides a unified, user-friendly interface that simplifies operation while the underlying complex control logic remains managed by the system's modular architecture, effectively decoupling interface simplicity from system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a graphical user interface that presents simplified representations and controls for the underlying complex cabin control systems. This interface layer copies essential control functions in an accessible format without requiring the physical complexity of the full control architecture to be visible or accessible to the user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP3381174B1System and method for representing a location of a fault in an aircraft cabin
Publication Date: 2023.06.21 BOMBARDIER INC
  • EP3381174B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3381174B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3381174B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and a distributed architecture for representing a location of a fault in an aircraft cabin, comprising: a controller operatively connected to a processor; a crew IO node operatively connected to the controller; the processor being configured to perform: detecting, by the controller, that an event of a system of the aircraft cabin corresponding to a fault has occurred; determining, by the processor, which aircraft cabin section amongst a plurality of aircraft cabin sections is associated with the system for which the event corresponding to the fault has occurred; and displaying, on the crew IO node, (i) a graphical user interface (GUI) component representing at least a portion of the aircraft cabin comprising at least some of the plurality of aircraft cabin sections and (ii) a visual indication identifying the aircraft cabin section associated with the system for which the event corresponding to the fault has occurred.