Vehicle Cabin Mode Transition Cues Through Variable Interior Change Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for notifying occupants of driving mode or travel mode transitions in vehicles lack the ability to vary the speed of changes in interior equipment, such as illumination color and position, which affects recognizability and spatial presentation of the cabin.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system that includes a mode transition determination unit and a controller to determine transitions in driving and travel modes, varying the speed of state changes in interior equipment like seat position, steering wheel angle, and interior lighting based on these determinations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If the speed of state change of interior equipment is kept constant, then the control system is simple, but the occupant awareness of mode changes is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant awareness of mode changesVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the speed of state change of interior equipment based on the current driving mode. In automated driving mode, the speed of state change is set to a first (faster) speed to enhance occupant awareness, while in manual driving mode, it is set to a second (slower) speed. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by making the system adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of state change speed based on the determined driving mode. The controller selects between a first state change speed and a second state change speed according to whether the vehicle is in automated or manual driving mode, respectively. This parameter change approach allows the system to optimize occupant awareness without requiring a completely complex control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the state change of interior equipment occurs rapidly, then the response to mode changes is immediate, but the spatial presentation in the cabin deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed of interior equipmentVSAvoidspatial presentation in the cabin
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the state change speed of interior equipment based on the driving mode. During automated driving, a faster state change speed is applied for immediate response, while during manual driving, a slower speed is used to maintain spatial presentation stability. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between response speed and spatial stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes the state change speed parameter according to the determined driving mode. When automated driving is detected, the first state change speed (faster) is applied; when manual driving is detected, the second state change speed (slower) is applied. This parameter switching resolves the contradiction by optimizing both response speed and spatial presentation according to operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a single state change speed is used for all driving modes, then the control system is simple, but the adaptability to different driving modes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different driving modesVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system becomes dynamic by adjusting the state change speed according to the determined driving mode. The system transitions from a static single-speed approach to a dynamic multi-speed approach, enhancing adaptability while maintaining relatively simple control logic through mode-based selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state change speed parameter based on the detected driving mode. By selecting between a first state change speed and a second state change speed according to whether automated or manual driving is active, the system achieves better adaptability without significantly increasing control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12606173B2Vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 SUBARU CORP
  • US12606173B2 patent drawing
  • US12606173B2 patent drawing
  • US12606173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a mode transition determination unit, and a controller. The mode transition determination unit is configured to make a determination as to whether or not one or both of a driving mode and a travel mode have made a transition. The controller is configured to vary a speed of a state change of interior equipment, based on a result of the determination by the mode transition determination unit.