In-Cabin Object Querying Using Multi-Modal Caption History

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional single-modal models struggle to effectively manage and monitor in-cabin objects in vehicles due to their limitations in processing diverse data types, leading to inefficiencies and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a large multi-modal model (LMM) that integrates visual, audio, and textual data to detect, recognize, and describe in-cabin objects, enabling continuous object tracking and personalized responses through continuous learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional single-modal models are used to process in-cabin data, then the system complexity is low, but the ability to effectively manage and monitor diverse in-cabin objects is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to process diverse data typesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple single-modal models (visual, audio, textual) into a unified large multi-modal model that can process diverse data types simultaneously. This merging approach enables the system to effectively manage and monitor various in-cabin objects by integrating different data modalities, resolving the contradiction between processing versatility and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The large multi-modal model is designed to perform multiple functions across different data modalities (visual, audio, textual) within a single system. This universal model can detect, recognize, and respond to various types of in-cabin objects and situations, providing adaptability without requiring separate specialized systems for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If continuous video capture and object tracking are implemented, then object monitoring accuracy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject monitoring accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously capturing video frames and generating captions for all detected objects, storing this information in advance. When a user queries about a specific object, the system can quickly retrieve pre-processed information rather than analyzing current video data from scratch, thus improving monitoring accuracy while reducing real-time energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by focusing computational resources on generating detailed captions and tracking only for objects that are relevant to user queries or safety concerns. Not all objects receive equal levels of processing intensity, allowing the system to maintain good monitoring accuracy while conserving energy on less critical objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system infers object locations from historical captions, then it can provide information about objects outside camera view, but inference accuracy may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to track objects outside viewVSAvoidlocation inference accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses historical captions as an intermediary data source to infer current object locations when objects are outside direct camera view. The captions serve as a mediator between past visual data and current query responses, enabling the system to provide information about objects not currently visible while managing the inherent accuracy trade-off through probabilistic inference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260038480A1In-Vehicle Object Queries with Large Multi-Modal Models
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US20260038480A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038480A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038480A1 patent drawing

AI summary

System and method for responding to queries about objects in a cabin of a vehicle. The system detects a trigger that causes an in-cabin camera to capture video of the cabin, and the system generates a history of captions for at least selected frames of the video by a large multi-modal model (LMM). The system converts a spoken query received by a microphone to a text-based prompt and generates, by the LMM, a response to the prompt based on the history of captions. The response is converted to speech that is output to a speaker.