Vehicle Cabin Smoke Detection Using Particulate Pattern Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In vehicles shared among multiple individuals, it is challenging to detect and identify the responsible party for smoking, leading to difficulties in enforcing a smoking ban and distributing the costs of vehicle decontamination.

Innovation Solution

A vehicular airborne particulate matter detection system comprising multiple sensors and a controller that generates alerts and captures images to classify cyclical particulate matter patterns as smoking events, providing audible and visual warnings and documenting evidence for responsible parties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple individuals share a vehicle, then vehicle utilization efficiency is improved, but identifying the responsible party for smoking becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle utilization efficiencyVSAvoididentification of responsible party
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a digital copy of visual evidence through camera imaging to identify the smoker. The camera captures images of occupants when smoking is detected, providing replicable evidence that can be reviewed later to identify the responsible party without requiring direct observation at the moment of smoking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary detection mechanism (particulate matter sensors combined with camera) that mediates between the smoking act and the identification process. This intermediary system automatically detects smoking events and captures identifying information, eliminating the need for manual monitoring or direct observation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a smoking ban is enforced in shared vehicles, then air quality and hygiene are improved, but the mechanism for monitoring and enforcement becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair qualityVSAvoidmonitoring mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple functions into a single integrated monitoring mechanism: particulate matter detection, pattern recognition, camera activation, and alert generation. This multi-functional approach improves air quality monitoring while consolidating what could otherwise be multiple separate systems into one unified solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-monitoring and self-enforcement by automatically detecting smoking events, identifying responsible parties through camera imaging, and generating alerts without requiring human intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously executing the entire monitoring and enforcement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If smoking detection technology is implemented, then enforcement capability is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenforcement capabilityVSAvoiddetection system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the detection function into two parts: a simple particulate matter sensor that detects smoking events, and a camera system that activates only when smoking is detected. This segmentation allows the majority of the system to remain simple while adding enforcement capability only where needed, rather than having a complex system running continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The camera system operates periodically or event-driven rather than continuously. The camera is activated only when the particulate matter sensor detects a smoking event, creating a periodic or triggered action pattern that reduces overall system complexity and resource consumption while maintaining enforcement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively detects smoking events, identifies responsible individuals, and alerts occupants, enabling fair cost distribution among users by providing evidence for vehicle cleaning, thus maintaining air quality and vehicle hygiene.

Implementation Method 1

a first particulate matter concentration sensor positioned in a passenger space of a vehicle, the first particulate matter concentration sensor configured to generate a first signal associated with an airborne particulate matter concentration in the passenger space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentEP3786914B1Vehicular airborne particulate matter detection system
Publication Date: 2023.10.11 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3786914B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3786914B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3786914B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A vehicular airborne particulate detection system in one embodiment includes a particulate matter concentration sensor positioned in a passenger space of a vehicle. The particulate matter concentration sensor generates a signal associated with an airborne particulate matter concentration in the passenger space which is analyzed by a controller to identify a cyclical particulate matter concentration pattern which is classified as a smoking event. The controller then generates an output using a user interface based upon the classified smoking event.