Storage Cabinet Base and Drawer Interlock for Heavy Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current storage cabinet assemblies are complex, costly, and difficult to assemble, with complicated designs that often fail under heavy loads and lack efficient drawer interlock mechanisms to prevent simultaneous drawer opening.

Innovation Solution

A storage cabinet assembly featuring a low-cost, easy-to-assemble base with corner support brackets and a drop-in drawer system, along with a drawer interlock assembly using cams and flexible stop elements to prevent misalignment and simultaneous drawer opening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional supporting assemblies are used for drawers, then the drawers can be slidably removed, but the supporting assemblies become complicated, expensive, and difficult to assemble

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrawer removalVSAvoidsupporting assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting assembly is divided into separate components: a mounting plate attached to the cabinet interior and individual drawer slides that attach to the drawer front. This segmentation allows each component to be simple and inexpensive while collectively providing the required drawer removal functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting plate is pre-attached to the cabinet interior before drawer installation. The drawer slides are pre-attached to the drawer front during drawer assembly. These preliminary actions simplify the final assembly process and reduce the complexity of the overall supporting system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional drawer interlock arrangements are used, then multiple drawers can be prevented from opening simultaneously, but the interlock arrangements become complicated and difficult to assemble

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrawer interlockVSAvoidinterlock arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drawer interlock function is merged with the drawer slide mechanism. The cam member is integrated into the slide assembly, and the rib on the drawer front serves dual purposes as both a structural element and the interlocking component. This merging eliminates the need for separate interlock mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The drawer slide mechanism automatically provides the interlock function through its own components (cam member and rib) without requiring additional dedicated interlock parts. The system serves itself by using existing structural elements to prevent simultaneous drawer opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Strength

If structural reinforcement is added to support heavy loads, then the base can support significant weight, but the base assembly becomes complicated and costly to manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload supportVSAvoidbase assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The base assembly is segmented into a separate mounting plate and the main cabinet structure. The mounting plate is a simple, inexpensive component that can be easily manufactured and attached, while the cabinet structure provides the primary load-bearing capacity. This segmentation avoids the need for a complex, heavily reinforced base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting plate acts as an intermediary between the cabinet structure and the drawer supporting components. It distributes loads efficiently and provides attachment points without requiring the base itself to be structurally complex or heavily reinforced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If complicated supporting assemblies are used for drawers, then the drawers can be supported, but the assembly becomes costly to manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrawer supportVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The drawer slide components are designed as simple, inexpensive parts that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed. The mounting plate and slides use basic materials and simple geometries, avoiding expensive materials or complex manufacturing processes while maintaining adequate support functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of attaching slides to the cabinet and having drawers slide on them, the invention inverts the approach by attaching slides to the drawer front and having them engage with the mounting plate. This inversion simplifies the components and reduces manufacturing costs while maintaining reliable drawer support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS7481503B2Storage cabinet assembly
Publication Date: 2009.01.27 STEELCASE INC
  • US7481503B2 patent drawing
  • US7481503B2 patent drawing
  • US7481503B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A storage cabinet assembly includes a housing including a pair of sidewalls, a rear wall, and a top wall that cooperate with one another to form a storage area, and a base assembly supporting the housing. The base assembly includes a top wall and a bottom wall that mate together to form an interior space, and a plurality of corner support brackets supporting the top wall from the bottom wall. The storage cabinet assembly further includes a drop-in drawer arrangement, and a drawer interlock assembly adapted to prevent multiple drawers from being simultaneously moved to an opened position.