Automated Cable Assembly Cartridge and Modular Stations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current process of assembling electrical cables is heavily dependent on human intervention and is based on serial activities, making it inefficient and prone to errors.

Innovation Solution

An automated cable assembly system that uses a cartridge and modular machines to perform various stages of the assembly process, including cutting, stripping, sorting, soldering, and testing, with a central controller coordinating the operations and actuators to move the cable through different stations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual assembly process is used, then flexibility in handling different cable types is maintained, but productivity is low and errors are frequent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assembly system is divided into modular stations (cutting station, stripping station, sorting station, assembly station, testing station) that process cables sequentially. Each station performs a specific function and can be independently configured, allowing high productivity through automation while managing complexity through modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system is designed to handle multiple cable types and connector configurations through programmable control. The same automated equipment can be reconfigured via software to accommodate different cable specifications, maintaining versatility while achieving high-speed automated assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If automated assembly is implemented, then productivity increases, but initial device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly throughputVSAvoidsystem implementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the assembly process into discrete modular stations, the system achieves high throughput at each stage while keeping individual station complexity manageable. This modular approach allows progressive implementation and easier maintenance compared to a monolithic automated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A central controller acts as an intermediary that coordinates all automated stations and actuators. This centralized control mechanism simplifies the implementation of automation by providing a single point of coordination, reducing the overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If manual operations are used, then system complexity is low, but manufacturing precision and accuracy decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly accuracyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The central controller serves as an intelligent intermediary that precisely coordinates all cutting, stripping, sorting, and assembly operations. This automated control ensures consistent high-precision assembly while managing the complexity of coordinating multiple automated functions through a unified control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates testing stations that provide feedback on assembly quality and cable specifications. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures high manufacturing precision by automatically detecting and correcting deviations, while the automated feedback collection and analysis manage the complexity of quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of time

If serial manual processes are used, then setup is simple, but loss of time occurs due to sequential operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly cycle timeVSAvoidautomated system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assembly line is segmented into parallel-capable modular stations that can process multiple cables simultaneously through the production line. This segmentation enables continuous flow production, dramatically reducing assembly cycle time while the modular structure keeps individual station complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system maintains continuous operation with cables moving constantly through all stations without interruption. The coordinated automation ensures that cutting, stripping, sorting, and assembly operations occur in continuous sequence without idle time, minimizing loss of time while the centralized controller manages the complexity of maintaining continuous coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11476628B2System for automatic robotic cable connector assembly using a cartridge
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 FRISIMOS
  • US11476628B2 patent drawing
  • US11476628B2 patent drawing
  • US11476628B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automatic-robotic-system-for-cable assembly system and method is provided. The method and system are configured to use a cartridge which holds one or both ends of the cable. The cartridge moves along an automatic cable assembly line, with the line segmented into different stages, at which a process is performed by a specific machine. Different machines, such as actuators or modular machines, perform operations on the cartridge at the different stages. In preparation for or as part of the operations, the actuators or modular machines may directly physically apply one or more forces to a cable held by the cartridge, causing the cable to spool toward or away from the modular machines.