Cable Avoidance Region for Mobile Earthmoving Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing obstacle detection systems for mining operations, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,064,926, face challenges in accurately detecting and avoiding moving obstacles like electric cables tethered to earthmoving machines, particularly due to difficulties in locating these cables during navigation.

Innovation Solution

An avoidance system that includes a sensor system to periodically detect the position of cables, a positioning system to determine cable guides, and a controller to define a cable avoidance region based on the position data, allowing for accurate tracking and navigation around the cables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the operator relies on visual inspection to locate cables, then the system remains simple, but the operator cannot see the ground near the truck and accurately locate cables

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable location detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces cable guides as intermediary objects that are easily visible and can be located from a distance. These guides serve as mediators between the invisible cables and the operator's vision, allowing the operator to infer cable positions by locating the guides rather than directly seeing the cables themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a visual copy or representation of the cable system through cable guides. The guides replicate the spatial information of the cables in a form that is visible and detectable, allowing the operator to perceive cable locations indirectly through these surrogate markers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If the operator tries to navigate around cables without detection aids, then the system remains simple, but mobility and navigation around cables becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation easeVSAvoidnavigation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Cable guides act as intermediary markers that simplify navigation by providing visible reference points. Instead of trying to navigate around invisible cables, the operator can easily see and navigate around the visible guides, which indicate cable locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The cable guides are made visually distinctive (potentially using color or other visual properties) to ensure they can be easily seen and differentiated from the surrounding environment, making navigation around them straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Loss of information

If cable guides are used to mark cable positions, then cable location becomes detectable, but the system complexity increases with additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable position information availabilityVSAvoidsystem component count
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cable guides create a simplified copy of the cable system's spatial arrangement. Rather than directly detecting the complex cable infrastructure, the system uses simple visible markers that replicate the essential positional information in an easily observable form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detectable parameters from the physical properties of cables (which are hard to see) to the visual properties of cable guides (which are easy to see). This parameter transformation makes position information available without requiring complex detection equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the operator must manually avoid cables during navigation, then no additional system is needed, but the risk of cable and truck damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable and truck damage preventionVSAvoidavoidance system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cable guides are placed in advance to mark where cables will be located. This preliminary action of positioning visible markers before navigation allows the operator to plan a safe path ahead, preventing damage before it can occur rather than reacting to invisible hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cable guides serve as intermediary warning markers that communicate cable locations to the operator. These guides mediate between the potential hazard (cables) and the operator, providing advance warning that enables preventive action to avoid damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7793442B2Avoidance system for locating electric cables
Publication Date: 2010.09.14 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US7793442B2 patent drawing
  • US7793442B2 patent drawing
  • US7793442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An avoidance system for a mobile earthmoving machine is disclosed. The avoidance system includes a sensor system configured to periodically detect a position of a cable tethered from the machine within a worksite and generate a position data set in response thereto. A controller is associated with the sensor system and configured to determine a cable avoidance region based on the position data set.