Devices configured to operate on an angled surface, and associated systems and methods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Construction tasks on angled surfaces, such as roofs, are labor-intensive, repetitive, and dangerous, leading to labor shortages despite increasing demand for automation, particularly in installing shingles and solar panels.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising a body assembly, arm assembly, and material handling assembly, controlled by a system with anchors and cables, allows for automated positioning and orientation on angled surfaces, enabling efficient placement and removal of materials like shingles or solar panels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual installation methods are used for shingles and solar panels on roofs, then ease of operation is maintained, but productivity is low and labor intensity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation speedVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated device positions and installs shingles and solar panels autonomously without human intervention on the roof. The system includes a positioning assembly with cables and anchors that automatically locates the device on the roof surface, and a material handling assembly that automatically places materials, eliminating the need for manual installation operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical installation operations with an automated robotic system. The device uses a body assembly with arm assemblies that mechanically position and place materials, substituting human labor with automated mechanical components including positioning cables, anchors, and material handling mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated devices are introduced to reduce manual labor, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated installation device is divided into distinct functional modules: a body assembly, positioning assembly with cables and anchors, arm assemblies for positioning and material handling, and a material handling assembly. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device is designed to perform multiple functions: positioning itself on the roof using cables and anchors, orienting its arm assemblies, handling various materials (shingles and solar panels), and installing them. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate devices or manual operations into a single automated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If manual material handling is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but loss of time increases and labor intensity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation timeVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The material handling assembly automatically loads, transports, and places materials without human intervention. The positioning assembly automatically positions the device and adjusts cable tensions to maintain optimal working conditions, eliminating the time-consuming manual tasks of positioning and material handling that would otherwise be required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If automated positioning systems are implemented, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidpositioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning system replaces manual positioning with an automated cable-based mechanical system. Cables connected to anchors on the roof and attachment points on the device create a precise positioning mechanism that can be controlled electronically, achieving high precision without complex electronic positioning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12559946B2Devices configured to operate on an angled surface, and associated systems and methods
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 RENOVATE ROBOTICS INC
  • US12559946B2 patent drawing
  • US12559946B2 patent drawing
  • US12559946B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices configured to operate on an angled surface (e.g., a roof), and associated systems and methods are disclosed herein. In some embodiments, representative systems include an apparatus with a body assembly, an arm assembly coupled to the body assembly, and a material handling assembly coupled to the arm assembly. The body assembly can include a body frame, and a plurality of positioning assemblies coupleable to cables and configured to position and/or orient the body frame on the surface. The arm assembly includes a proximal end portion rotatably coupled to the body portion and a distal end portion opposite the proximal end portion. The material handling assembly is coupled to the distal end portion of the arm assembly and is configured to carry a surface material to be positioned on the angled surface.