Cable Spacer Design for Alien Crosstalk Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cable arrangements face challenges in minimizing crosstalk between adjacent cables transmitting differential signals, particularly in complex and costly shielding methods that can impact weight and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

The use of spacers on the outside of cable sheaths to increase the minimum distance between stranded groups, ensuring a predetermined spacing that reduces alien crosstalk, with the spacers being additional cable jackets made of lightweight materials like foamed plastic, which can be easily applied and extend over the entire cable length.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If shielding is used to reduce alien crosstalk between cables, then crosstalk reduction is improved, but weight and flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealien crosstalkVSAvoidcable weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful shielding layer is extracted and removed from the cable structure. Instead of using traditional metallic shielding, the patent relies on the natural geometric separation between cables to achieve crosstalk reduction, thereby eliminating the weight penalty associated with shielding materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary air gap is introduced between adjacent cables as the separating mechanism. This air space acts as a natural insulator and separator, reducing electromagnetic coupling between cables without requiring additional shielding materials, thus maintaining flexibility while reducing crosstalk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If shielding is used to reduce alien crosstalk between cables, then crosstalk reduction is improved, but flexibility and ease of routing deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealien crosstalkVSAvoidflexibility and routing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The rigid shielding structure is extracted and removed, allowing the cables to maintain their inherent flexibility. The solution replaces the need for flexible shielding with a simple geometric arrangement that preserves the cable's ability to be routed and installed easily.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The minimum distance parameter between cables is optimized to provide sufficient separation for crosstalk reduction while maintaining cable flexibility. By carefully selecting this geometric parameter, the patent achieves electromagnetic isolation without compromising mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If complex stranding arrangements are used to reduce crosstalk, then crosstalk reduction is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecrosstalkVSAvoidcable structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex internal stranding structures and varying lay lengths are extracted and simplified. The patent adopts uniform stranding parameters across all conductor pairs, eliminating the manufacturing complexity associated with variable pitch and multiple stranding patterns while still achieving acceptable crosstalk performance through proper cable spacing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The cable structure is segmented into simple, repeatable units with uniform stranding. This segmentation approach allows for standardized manufacturing processes and simplifies production while maintaining effective electromagnetic isolation between adjacent cables through geometric separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Object-affected harmful factors

If increased distance between stranding groups is implemented, then alien crosstalk is reduced, but cable cross-sectional area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealien crosstalkVSAvoidcable cross-sectional area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The minimum distance parameter between adjacent cables is optimized to achieve the necessary crosstalk reduction with minimal increase in overall cable bundle size. By carefully selecting this separation distance, the patent balances electromagnetic isolation requirements with space constraints in installation environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively suppresses crosstalk between cables while maintaining cable flexibility and reducing material usage, making the cable arrangement easier to produce and less expensive.

Implementation Method 1

The coupling of an external signal from the first conductor pair into an adjacent second conductor pair can occur inductively or capacitively

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3132513B1Cable arrangement
Publication Date: 2019.11.20 ROSENBERGER HOCHFREQUENZTECHNIK GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3132513B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The invention relates to an arrangement (100) of at least two adjacently extending cables (10, 20), of which a first cable (10) and a second cable (20) which each have at least one stranding group (11, 21) that has two or more conductors (32) stranded to each other and which each have a common cable sheath (15, 25) surrounding the stranding group, a spacer (30) being provided outside on at least one of the cable sheaths (15, 25) for increasing a minimum distance (A) between the stranding groups (11, 21) of the two cables (10, 20).