Cable Switch Crank Mechanism for Stable Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cable transportation system switches with heavy moving parts require significant travel and time for track switching, and existing solutions need locking devices to prevent unwanted movement of movable guides.

Innovation Solution

A switch design featuring a movable guide with one degree of freedom and an actuating assembly comprising a rotary actuator and a crank, which achieves stable positions geometrically without the need for locking devices, using a pin and slot mechanism or connecting rods for operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a switch uses heavy moving parts to ensure stability, then reliability is improved, but switching time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidswitching time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The switch mechanism is divided into separate functional components: a movable guide for track selection and a distinct actuating assembly with crank and limit stops for positioning. This segmentation allows the movable guide to be lighter while maintaining stability through the geometric constraint system rather than relying on heavy mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism transitions from static heavy-duty construction to a dynamic system using a crank rotating between limit stops. The crank's rotational motion between two stable positions enables rapid switching while the geometric configuration maintains reliability without requiring heavy components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a switch uses a simple movable guide mechanism, then device complexity is reduced, but unwanted movement occurs requiring locking devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism complexityVSAvoidposition stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The movable guide is integrated into a dynamic mechanism where a crank rotates between two limit stops defined by the geometry of the system. This creates two stable positions without requiring locking devices, as the geometric configuration itself prevents unwanted movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism is self-stabilizing through its geometric design. The crank and movable guide configuration automatically maintains stable positions without external locking devices, and the system self-regulates to prevent unwanted movement through its inherent geometric constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a switch uses geometric stability without locking devices, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the mechanism must maintain stability under operational forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking device requirementsVSAvoidoperational force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The crank mechanism rotates between two stable positions defined by the geometric relationship between the crank and movable guide. This dynamic configuration allows the mechanism to withstand operational forces while maintaining stability without locking devices, as the geometric constraints naturally resist unwanted movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2772403B1Cable transportation system switch
Publication Date: 2017.05.24 LEITNER SPA VIPITENO
  • EP2772403B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2772403B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2772403B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A switch (5) for a cable transportation system (1) has a movable guide (8) with one degree of freedom, along an operating plane (9), between two given positions; and an actuating assembly (10) having a rotary actuator (11), and a crank (12) which is rotated by the rotary actuator (11) between two limit stops about an axis of rotation (A2) perpendicular to the operating plane (9), and is connected to the movable guide (8) in such a manner as to define a mechanism having two stable positions corresponding to the given positions of the movable guide (8) when the crank (12) is in the limit stop positions.