Aerial Cableway Station Sensor-Activated Passenger Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aerial cableway systems face challenges in coordinating passenger boarding, leading to uncertainty and safety risks due to an unpredictable number of passengers in the loading area, which can result in overcrowding or under-occupation of vehicles.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a sensor-activated system with restrictors, such as turnstiles or optical displays, that control passenger flow into and out of designated areas within the station, ensuring only a predefined number of passengers can board each vehicle, thereby maintaining safety and optimizing vehicle occupancy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If no passenger flow control system is implemented, then passengers can freely access the loading area, but this leads to an uncontrolled number of passengers causing safety risks and vehicle under-occupation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety in loading areaVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor detects a vehicle's approach in advance and activates the restrictor before the vehicle arrives at the loading area. This preliminary action allows the system to pre-control passenger flow, ensuring only the appropriate number of passengers enter the delimited area before the vehicle stops, thereby preventing overcrowding while maintaining safety without requiring complex real-time intervention mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The restrictor acts as an intermediary device between the free-access loading area and the delimited area. It mediates passenger flow by controlling entry based on vehicle presence, separating the unrestricted public space from the controlled boarding zone. This intermediary mechanism simplifies overall system complexity by handling control at a single point rather than requiring comprehensive monitoring throughout the entire loading area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the loading area is fully open for rapid boarding, then boarding speed increases, but this causes uncertainty about which passengers can board and creates pushing risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboarding speedVSAvoidpassenger pushing and safety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The loading area is segmented into two distinct zones: a delimited area with controlled access where only authorized passengers can enter, and the remaining loading area that stays accessible. This segmentation allows rapid boarding in the open zone while preventing harmful pushing behaviors in the controlled zone, as passengers know exactly how many spots are available and when boarding is authorized

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor provides feedback about vehicle presence to the restrictor controller, which automatically adjusts restrictor activation timing. This feedback loop ensures that the restrictor is activated only when a vehicle is detected and remains active until the vehicle departs, creating a dynamic control system that adapts to real-time conditions and maintains safety without manual intervention while preserving boarding efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a restrictor system is implemented to control passenger flow, then passenger safety and vehicle occupancy are improved, but this requires additional sensors, controllers, and restrictor devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidnumber of control devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The restrictor device performs multiple functions: it controls passenger entry to the delimited area, enforces vehicle capacity limits, provides visual feedback about boarding status, and automatically activates/deactivates based on vehicle presence. By consolidating these multiple safety and control functions into a single multi-functional device rather than requiring separate systems for each function, the overall device complexity is reduced while maintaining comprehensive safety coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10392030B2Aerial cableway system
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 INNOVA PATENT GMBH
  • US10392030B2 patent drawing
  • US10392030B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerial cableway system has at least two stations between which vehicles, such as gondola cars, travel as they are pulled by a cable. The stations include a boarding zone for passengers to board the vehicles and a disembarking zone, where passengers disembark from the vehicles. A sensor can be activated by a vehicle entering a station. At least one restricted area with at least one restrictor is located in the station and the restrictor has a controller which can be activated by the sensor.