Cache Prefetcher Feedback Loop for Latency and Bandwidth Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cache prefetching systems face inefficiencies due to unmanaged prefetch distances, leading to premature eviction of useful cache lines and unnecessary bandwidth consumption, as they fail to adapt to changing access frequencies and latencies in a hierarchy of caches.

Innovation Solution

The prefetch distance for each cache in a hierarchy is managed using feedback from cache hits and misses, capping or incrementing the distance based on access patterns and confidence levels to optimize performance without over-prefetching, thereby reducing cache pollution and latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If prefetch distance is increased to reduce latency, then cache hit rate improves, but cache pollution increases and useful lines are prematurely evicted

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidcache line usefulness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that monitors cache hit/miss information from L1 cache accesses to L2 cache. When a prefetch causes a cache miss in L1, the system checks if the corresponding address exists in L2. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from actual cache behavior and adjust prefetching strategies dynamically, preventing pollution while maintaining low latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts prefetch distance based on observed cache patterns and confidence levels rather than using a fixed prefetch distance. The system incrementally increases prefetch distance only when confidence in the prefetch pattern exceeds a threshold, allowing adaptive optimization that balances latency reduction with cache pollution prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If too much information is prefetched, then latency is reduced, but bandwidth consumption increases and cache efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by prefetching only the necessary amount of data based on confidence levels and observed patterns. Rather than aggressively prefetching large distances, the system performs 'just enough' prefetching to reduce latency while avoiding excessive bandwidth consumption. The prefetch distance is carefully controlled to match actual demand patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If prefetch distance is increased to anticipate future requests, then cache hit rate improves, but confidence in pattern accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecache hit rateVSAvoidpattern confidence
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts prefetch distance based on confidence levels. When confidence in a prefetch pattern is high, the system can safely increase prefetch distance to improve cache hit rate. When confidence is low, prefetch distance is limited to avoid incorrect predictions. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize cache performance while respecting pattern accuracy constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9262328B2Using cache hit information to manage prefetches
Publication Date: 2016.02.16 NVIDIA CORP
  • US9262328B2 patent drawing
  • US9262328B2 patent drawing
  • US9262328B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Cache hit information is used to manage (e.g., cap) the prefetch distance for a cache. In an embodiment in which there is a first cache and a second cache, where the second cache (e.g., a level two cache) has greater latency than the first cache (e.g., a level one cache), a prefetcher prefetches cache lines to the second cache and is configured to receive feedback from that cache. The feedback indicates whether an access request issued in response to a cache miss in the first cache results in a cache hit in the second cache. The prefetch distance for the second cache is determined according to the feedback.