Cache Server File Locking for Web IDE Conflict Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Web IDE systems face inefficiencies due to uncontrolled file read/write permissions, data loss when switching devices, and security concerns, particularly in collaborative development environments where multiple developers can edit the same file simultaneously, leading to conflicts and security vulnerabilities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a file locking mechanism using a cache server as a buffer between the file server and the Web IDE server, allowing exclusive file operation rights and reducing the need for database modifications, which enhances collaborative development by preventing conflicts and improving user experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple developers can edit the same file simultaneously without locking mechanism, then collaborative development flexibility is improved, but file content conflicts and data integrity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaborative development flexibilityVSAvoidfile content consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a file locking mechanism that acts as an intermediary between multiple developers and the file being edited. When a developer opens a file for editing, the system creates a lock record in the cache server that prevents other developers from simultaneously writing to the same file. This mediator (locking mechanism) coordinates access without requiring developers to manually negotiate, thus maintaining collaborative flexibility while ensuring file content consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If client terminal caching is used to improve development efficiency, then operation speed is improved, but permission control and data security deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment efficiencyVSAvoidpermission control issues
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a cache server as an intermediary layer between the client terminal and the file system. The cache server stores file locking information and operation data, acting as a mediator that enforces permission control policies. This allows the client terminal to operate efficiently with cached data while the cache server maintains security by validating permissions and controlling access rights, thus resolving the conflict between operational speed and security control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If all modification contents are saved in client terminal cache, then operation speed is improved, but data loss risk when switching terminals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation speedVSAvoidmodification data loss
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dual-storage strategy where modification contents are simultaneously maintained in both the client terminal cache and the cache server. The cache server stores copies of operation data and file states, creating a redundant backup system. This allows fast local operations while ensuring data persistence, as modifications can be recovered from the cache server copy if the client terminal is switched or data is lost locally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Ease of operation

If developers have arbitrary permission to modify cached data, then operation flexibility is improved, but system security deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation flexibilityVSAvoidsecurity vulnerabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the cache server continuously monitors and validates operations on cached data. When developers attempt to modify cached data, the system checks permission records and operation legitimacy before allowing changes. This feedback loop maintains security by preventing unauthorized modifications while preserving operational flexibility for legitimate actions, as the system responds to each operation with appropriate permission verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10338917B2Method, apparatus, and system for reading and writing files
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
  • US10338917B2 patent drawing
  • US10338917B2 patent drawing
  • US10338917B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for reading and writing files includes: receiving an access request, and acquiring file identifier information and first user identifier information according to the access request; querying a cache server for a locked file corresponding to the file identifier information, and acquiring a first original file corresponding to the file identifier information from a file server if the locked file corresponding to the file identifier information is not found; generating a locked file according to the first user identifier information and the first original file, and submitting the locked file to the cache server; and receiving an editing operation for the first original file, and submitting the edited first original file to the cache server. The method prevents the users from submitting conflicting contents when operating the same file, so that a Web IDE system may play a more important role in multiple collaborative development processes.