Orchestration Server Cache Validation via Timestamp Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current caching techniques in computing devices do not effectively manage data synchronization between local and external servers, leading to inefficiencies in network traffic and data freshness, especially when user devices request content access.

Innovation Solution

An orchestration server is introduced to store cached data records and validate them against master records from external servers, ensuring up-to-date information is provided to user devices while minimizing network communication by using timestamps and a Time To Live (TTL) mechanism to manage cache validity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If cached data is stored locally without validation, then network traffic is reduced, but data freshness and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork trafficVSAvoiddata freshness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the orchestration server validates cached data against master data by comparing timestamps. When cached data becomes stale (modification time exceeds TTL), the system automatically triggers an update by communicating with the external server, ensuring data freshness while minimizing unnecessary network traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The orchestration server performs preliminary validation of cached data before serving it to user devices. By checking timestamps and validating data freshness in advance, the system ensures reliable data delivery without requiring real-time communication with external servers, thus reducing network traffic while maintaining data quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If cached data is frequently validated against external servers, then data freshness is improved, but network traffic and communication overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata freshnessVSAvoidnetwork traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial validation by only checking timestamps and comparing modification times rather than fully validating the entire cached dataset. This selective approach ensures data freshness is maintained while minimizing network communication overhead, as the system only contacts external servers when timestamp comparison indicates staleness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses TTL (Time To Live) as a dynamic parameter to control cache validity. By changing the validation approach from continuous to event-driven (based on timestamp comparison against TTL), the system optimizes the balance between data freshness and network traffic, validating only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If an orchestration server is introduced to manage caching, then data synchronization and freshness are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata synchronizationVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The orchestration server performs multiple functions: it acts as a cache storage, a validation mechanism, a TTL manager, and a coordinator for updates. By consolidating these functions into a single component, the system improves data synchronization without proportionally increasing overall system complexity, as the orchestration server replaces multiple separate mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The orchestration server serves as an intermediary between user devices and external servers, managing all caching and validation operations centrally. This mediator approach simplifies the overall architecture by providing a single point of control for data synchronization, rather than requiring complex peer-to-peer validation between multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of time

If timestamp validation is implemented, then data update timing is improved, but measurement and detection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata update timingVSAvoidtimestamp validation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The cached data includes its own timestamp metadata that enables self-validation. The orchestration server simply compares the cached timestamp with the current time or with timestamps from master data, allowing the system to automatically determine data freshness without complex detection mechanisms. The data essentially validates itself through its embedded temporal information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10893119B2Time-based data caching
Publication Date: 2021.01.12 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US10893119B2 patent drawing
  • US10893119B2 patent drawing
  • US10893119B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is configured to receive, by a first server, a request, from a user device, for a first record stored by a cache associated with the first server, determine, a first timestamp associated with the first record, determine that the first record is invalid based on the first timestamp, and determine, based on determining that the first record is invalid, whether the first record is out of date with respect to a corresponding second record stored by a second server by comparing a second timestamp of the first record with a timestamp of the second record. The system is further configured to update the first record with information from the second record to form an updated first record when the first record is out of date, and to send the updated first record to the user device associated with the request.