Automatic CAD Algorithm Selection via Image Header Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In clinical imaging, manual interaction is required to select appropriate computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms for processing images, as explicit knowledge about the imaged body parts is often not digitally available, leading to inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A computer system and method for automatic CAD algorithm selection, which analyzes image headers, detects image parameters, and selects a CAD processing method based on these attributes, enabling automatic processing without user intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual interaction is used to select CAD algorithms, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but processing time and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidmanual interaction requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically selects appropriate CAD algorithms by analyzing image headers and detecting image parameters without requiring manual user input. The selector component autonomously processes image data characteristics and determines the most suitable CAD processing method, eliminating the need for manual algorithm selection while maintaining optimal processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of image headers and parameters before CAD processing begins. By pre-detecting image characteristics and predetermined the appropriate algorithm selection based on these attributes, the system prepares the processing pathway in advance, thereby improving overall processing efficiency without requiring manual intervention during the actual processing workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automatic algorithm selection is implemented, then processing efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the automatic algorithm selection process into distinct functional components: an image header analysis module that extracts metadata, an image parameter detection module that analyzes image characteristics, and a selector module that determines the appropriate CAD algorithm. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, managing system complexity through modular design while maintaining high processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The selector component serves multiple functions: it analyzes image headers, detects image parameters, determines appropriate CAD algorithms, and routes images to the correct processing pipeline. By consolidating these diverse functions into a single multi-functional selector module, the system improves processing efficiency without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If manual selection of CAD algorithms is required, then algorithm accuracy can be optimized by expert knowledge, but time consumption and operational effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the selector continuously learns from previous algorithm selections and their outcomes. By analyzing the effectiveness of past CAD algorithm applications on similar image types, the system refines its selection criteria and improves detection accuracy over time, automatically capturing expert knowledge without requiring manual intervention for each new image

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts selection parameters based on image characteristics detected from headers and parameters. By changing the weighting and criteria of selection parameters according to the specific image type, modality, and characteristics, the system maintains high detection accuracy comparable to expert manual selection while eliminating the time required for manual algorithm optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8134571B2Automatic CAD algorithm selection
Publication Date: 2012.03.13 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
  • US8134571B2 patent drawing
  • US8134571B2 patent drawing
  • US8134571B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system for automatic selection of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm including a database storing image data, a browser for navigating the data and selecting image data, an application receiving image data selected by the browser, and a selector selecting a CAD algorithm for processing the image data according to at least one of fixed attributes of the image data and an indication of a subject of the image data.