3D CAD Inspection Sequencing for Small-Batch Component Features

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Small batch sizes in manufacturing complicate inspection decisions, leading to time-consuming and costly processes under conventional inspection methods, especially for complex components with many characteristics to inspect.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize three-dimensional CAD models to identify common geometric features, generate inspection sequences, collect and analyze manufacturing data, and modify inspection frequencies based on process capability and performance metrics, reducing the need for extensive inspections when these metrics exceed predetermined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all components of a batch are inspected under conventional inspection processes, then inspection reliability is improved, but inspection time and manufacturing cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection frequency is made dynamic rather than static. The system automatically adjusts inspection frequency based on real-time process capability metrics (Cpk, Ppk) and manufacturing data analysis. When process capability is high, inspection frequency decreases; when capability drops, frequency increases. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by maintaining reliability through adaptive sampling rather than universal inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where manufacturing data from machining processes is collected, analyzed, and used to adjust inspection strategies. Process capability metrics are continuously monitored and fed back to modify inspection sequences. This feedback mechanism ensures reliability is maintained while optimizing inspection resources to improve productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If inspection frequency is increased for small batch sizes, then inspection coverage is improved, but inspection time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection coverageVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of inspection frequency from a fixed value to a variable determined by process capability metrics. Instead of applying a uniform high inspection frequency to all small batch components, the system calculates optimal frequencies based on Cpk and Ppk values, manufacturing complexity, and feature criticality. This parameter change allows adequate coverage while minimizing unnecessary inspection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial inspection rather than complete inspection by using statistically valid sampling frequencies. When process capability is demonstrated to be sufficient, the system inspects only a partial subset of components rather than all components, maintaining adequate coverage through statistical principles while significantly reducing inspection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple geometric characteristics are inspected for each component, then measurement precision is improved, but inspection complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric characteristic measurementVSAvoidinspection sequence complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection process is segmented into hierarchical levels: component level, feature level, and characteristic level. The system segments inspection requirements based on feature criticality and process capability, creating customized inspection sequences for different feature types. This segmentation allows comprehensive measurement of necessary characteristics while simplifying the overall inspection process by focusing only on relevant features for each component type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates universal inspection sequences that can be applied across multiple component types sharing common features. By identifying and grouping common geometric features across different components, the system develops reusable inspection routines that measure the same critical characteristics across various parts, reducing overall inspection complexity while maintaining measurement precision through standardized procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12117813B2Component inspection system and method
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US12117813B2 patent drawing
  • US12117813B2 patent drawing
  • US12117813B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for inspecting components includes providing a plurality of different three-dimensional component CAD models with each three-dimensional component CAD model of the plurality of different three-dimensional component CAD models sharing at least one common geometric feature. The method further includes generating an inspection sequence for the at least one common geometric feature, collecting feature manufacturing data for the at least one common geometric feature during manufacturing of a plurality of different components corresponding to the respective plurality of different three-dimensional component CAD models, analyzing the feature manufacturing data associated with the at least one common geometric feature, modifying the inspection sequence for the at least one common geometric feature based on the analyzed feature manufacturing data, and inspecting components based on the modified inspection sequence.