CAD Object Recommendation Engine for Third-Party Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer-aided design (CAD) platforms face challenges in providing efficient user experiences due to generic environments and limited access to data or functionality, as well as difficulties in facilitating network communications with third-party computing systems for objects used in CAD projects, leading to inefficient use of electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that generate a user-specific set of objects by interfacing with multiple third-party computing systems, allowing for customized object placement and positioning within a virtual environment, and enabling network communication and logistical operations for object acquisition, using machine learning or rules-based models to process object data and provide recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a generic CAD environment is provided, then the system is simple to implement, but user efficiency and customization are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the object library into multiple specialized third-party computing systems, each handling specific object types or functions. This allows the CAD platform to provide comprehensive functionality without monolithic complexity, improving user efficiency while maintaining manageable system architecture through modular organization of object sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The CAD platform introduces an intermediary layer that manages communications between the user interface and multiple third-party computing systems. This mediator handles object acquisition, placement, and positioning operations, shielding users from underlying system complexity while enabling enhanced functionality and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple third-party computing systems are integrated, then object availability and customization improve, but network communication complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject availabilityVSAvoidnetwork communication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal communication interface that handles multiple functions (object acquisition, placement, positioning, and metadata management) through a single standardized protocol. This allows integration with diverse third-party computing systems while maintaining consistent interaction patterns, thereby improving object availability without proportionally increasing communication complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Each third-party computing system provides self-service capabilities by exposing standardized interfaces for object data exchange. The systems autonomously manage their own object inventories and communication protocols, reducing the burden on the central CAD platform to manage complex network communications while still providing broad object availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If manual object acquisition processes are used, then system complexity is low, but time consumption and user burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition efficiencyVSAvoidautomation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically pre-fetching and pre-positioning object data from third-party computing systems based on design requirements. Objects are prepared and staged in advance within the virtual environment, enabling rapid deployment without manual intervention while the automation manages the complexity of data retrieval and initial configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where the CAD platform monitors object usage patterns and design progress, automatically triggering additional object acquisitions and adjustments. This feedback-driven automation improves productivity by anticipating user needs and proactively managing object inventory, while the intelligent feedback mechanisms prevent excessive automation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11977821B1Object processing in computer-aided design systems and related methods
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 THE CANOA SUPPLY CO PBC
  • US11977821B1 patent drawing
  • US11977821B1 patent drawing
  • US11977821B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In the context of a computer-aided design platform providing a user-specific set of acquirable objects, a CAD design and object acquisition computing system is configured for accessing a set of object properties for a particular object; analyzing object selection data indicating a set of currently placed within the CAD environment, analyzing related design data comprising a set of design data for a set of other virtual environments, wherein at least a portion of the other virtual environments in the set of other virtual environments include the particular object; accessing an object design ruleset defining one or more selection limitations; processing the set of object properties, the object selection data, the related design data, and the object design ruleset using at least one of a rules-based model or a machine-learning model to generate an object recommendation; and modifying a graphical user interface to include an indication of the object recommendation.