Computer-Aided Detection System with User-Validated Feature Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer-aided detection (CAD) systems face challenges in accurately identifying and diagnosing abnormalities in medical images, often requiring radiologist expertise and leading to unnecessary biopsies due to inadequate automated detection and diagnosis capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A CAD system that segments medical images to extract relevant features, allows user interaction for confirmation or modification of detected features, and computes a diagnosis using a combination of pre-defined criteria and AI rules, providing a dynamic and validated diagnosis report.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated detection and diagnosis capabilities are enhanced, then diagnostic accuracy and reliability improve, but system complexity and requirement for user interaction increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The CAD system segments the diagnostic process into distinct modules: image acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, analysis, and diagnosis generation. Each module handles specific tasks independently, allowing the system to manage complexity through functional decomposition while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy through specialized processing at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary review stage where detected features and preliminary diagnoses are presented to users for validation and modification before finalization. This intermediary layer bridges automated detection and final diagnosis, enabling the system to leverage AI capabilities while incorporating human expertise to resolve complexity and ensure reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated detection capabilities are improved, then productivity increases, but measurement precision of abnormalities may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoidabnormality detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detection results are continuously refined based on user validation and modification. Detected features are presented to users who can confirm or correct them, and this feedback loop continuously improves measurement precision while maintaining high productivity through automated initial detection and structured review processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated detection and feature extraction before user review, preparing candidate abnormalities and extracted features in advance. This preliminary action handles routine detection tasks automatically to maintain productivity, while user review focuses specifically on validating and refining measurements to ensure precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If user interaction and validation are incorporated, then diagnosis reliability improves, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis reliabilityVSAvoiddiagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial user interaction by presenting only the most uncertain or critical detected features and diagnosis candidates for user review, rather than requiring validation of all findings. This partial action approach maintains diagnosis reliability for critical cases while reducing time consumption by automating confidence-high detections without user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7783094B2System and method of computer-aided detection
Publication Date: 2010.08.24 THE MEDIPATTERN CORP
  • US7783094B2 patent drawing
  • US7783094B2 patent drawing
  • US7783094B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a system and method for computer-aided detection (“CAD”). The invention relates to computer-aided automatic detection of abnormalities in and analysis of medical images. Medical images are analyzed, to extract and identify a set of features in the image relevant to a diagnosis. The system computes an initial diagnosis based on the set of identified features and a diagnosis model, which are provided to a user for review and modification. A computed diagnosis is dynamically re-computed upon user modification of the set of identified features. Upon a user selecting a diagnosis based on system recommendation, a diagnosis report is generated reflecting features present in the medical image as validated by the user and the user selected diagnosis.