Computed Axial Lithography Light-Field Optimization for Volumetric 3D Curing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing technologies face limitations in speed, surface quality, and complexity when producing 3D objects with overhanging, bridging, or spanning elements due to the layer-by-layer building process, which Computed Axial Lithography (CAL) aims to overcome by volumetrically solidifying photopolymers using intensity-modulated light energy from multiple angles.

Innovation Solution

The Computed Axial Lithography Optimization (CALO) system determines the light intensity field needed to cure photoreactive materials within a container by employing the Attenuated Radon Transform and optimization techniques, ensuring that only the required voxels receive the necessary energy dose for object formation, while minimizing the cost function to achieve efficient manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If layer-by-layer additive manufacturing is used, then material can be added at selected locations, but manufacturing speed is slow and surface quality is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective material additionVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D layer-by-layer additive manufacturing to 3D volumetric manufacturing by projecting light from multiple angles simultaneously. The container rotates during manufacturing, enabling light to cure resin throughout the entire volume rather than building up layer by layer, thus achieving arbitrary 3D geometries in a single step while dramatically improving manufacturing speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The container rotates periodically during the manufacturing process, allowing the light source to illuminate and cure resin from different angular positions. This periodic rotation enables uniform energy distribution throughout the volume while maintaining continuous manufacturing operation, resolving the contradiction between selective material addition and manufacturing speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Ease of manufacture

If layer-by-layer additive manufacturing is used, then material can be added at selected locations, but surface quality of objects is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective material additionVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By moving from 2D layerwise curing to 3D volumetric curing through multi-angle light projection, the patent eliminates the stair-step artifacts inherent in layer-by-layer manufacturing. The entire volume cures simultaneously, producing smooth surfaces without layer lines, thus improving manufacturing precision while maintaining selective material addition capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If layer-by-layer additive manufacturing is used, then material can be added at selected locations, but geometry limitations occur for overhanging, bridging, or spanning elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective material additionVSAvoidgeometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables arbitrary 3D geometries including overhanging, bridging, and spanning elements by curing resin volumetrically from multiple angles. Unlike layer-by-layer methods that require support structures for overhangs, the volumetric approach cures material in mid-air from all necessary directions simultaneously, eliminating geometry limitations and dramatically increasing adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing system achieves universal applicability to any 3D geometry by combining container rotation with multi-angle light projection. The same system configuration can produce any arbitrary shape without requiring different support structures or process modifications, making the method universally adaptable to complex geometries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If Computed Axial Lithography is used to manufacture complex geometries, then manufacturing time is reduced, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational work by pre-calculating the optimal light intensity distribution and projection angles using the adjoint of the Attenuated Radon Transform. This pre-computation creates a lookup table or preset parameters that guide the actual manufacturing process, enabling fast real-time execution without complex calculations during production, thus resolving the contradiction between manufacturing speed and computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

CALO enables the production of complex 3D geometries with improved surface quality and reduced manufacturing time by accurately delivering the required energy dose to specific voxels, overcoming the limitations of traditional additive manufacturing methods.

Implementation Method 1

CAL supports the manufacturing of 3D objects with arbitrary geometries volumetrically through photopolymerization of a desired geometry in a single step

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

CAL determines the images by reversal of the processing used in Computed Tomography (CT)... CAL determines what the projector images would be given the 3D geometry of the 3D object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComputed Axial Lithography:

Data Source

PatentUS11809161B2Computed axial lithography optimization system
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NAT SECURITY LLC
  • US11809161B2 patent drawing
  • US11809161B2 patent drawing
  • US11809161B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for determining a light intensity field for use in manufacturing a 3D object from a volume of material. The system receives a 3D specification of a 3D geometry for the 3D object that specifies voxels within the volume that contain material that is to be part of the 3D object. The system employs a cost function for effectiveness of a light intensity field in manufacturing the 3D object. The cost function may be an adjoint of an Attenuated Radon Transform that models an energy dose that each voxel would receive during manufacture of the 3D object using the light intensity field. The system applies an optimization technique that employs the cost function to generate a measure of the effectiveness of possible light intensity fields and outputs an indication of a light intensity field that will be effective in manufacturing the 3D object.