Calcium Boride Armor Composite Hardness Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current armor components lack improved mechanical characteristics such as hardness and density, necessitating the development of more effective materials for protective applications.

Innovation Solution

The creation of armor components comprising at least 90 wt% calcium boride compounds, including non-stoichiometric and stoichiometric calcium boride, with a density of at least 80% theoretical density, achieved through a hot pressing process involving specific heating rates, atmospheres, and pressures, along with the incorporation of silicon carbide and boron carbide to enhance mechanical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional armor materials (silicon carbide, boron carbide) are used, then hardness is achieved, but density and toughness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardnessVSAvoiddensity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite materials by combining calcium boride compounds with silicon carbide and boron carbide in specific proportions. This composite approach allows the armor component to achieve both high hardness from the carbide phases and improved density from the calcium boride matrix, resolving the contradiction between hardness and density that limits traditional single-material armor systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by controlling the stoichiometry of calcium boride (using both stoichiometric CaB6 and non-stoichiometric CaBx where x<6) and optimizing the particle size distribution of all constituent materials. These parameter adjustments enable the composite to achieve optimal packing density and mechanical properties, simultaneously improving density without sacrificing hardness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional armor materials are used, then some protective capability is provided, but toughness and resistance to penetration are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to penetrationVSAvoidtoughness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-phase composite structure combining calcium boride, silicon carbide, and boron carbide creates a synergistic effect where the harder carbide phases provide penetration resistance while the calcium boride matrix contributes to toughness. This composite architecture resolves the contradiction between penetration resistance and toughness by distributing mechanical stresses across different phases with complementary properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating a heterogeneous microstructure where different phases are distributed throughout the material. The silicon carbide and boron carbide particles are dispersed within the calcium boride matrix, with each phase performing its specialized function: the carbide phases provide localized hard points for penetration resistance while the calcium boride provides a tougher matrix that prevents catastrophic failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If high density armor materials are formulated, then protective capability improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedensityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-mixing the calcium boride, silicon carbide, and boron carbide powders in the correct proportions before sintering. This pre-mixing step ensures homogeneous distribution of phases throughout the green body, simplifying the subsequent sintering process and reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining the desired high density and multi-phase structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by optimizing the sintering temperature, pressure, and atmosphere to achieve dense consolidation of the multi-phase composite. By carefully controlling these sintering parameters, the process achieves high density without requiring excessively complex manufacturing steps, as the pre-mixed powder composition facilitates uniform densification throughout the component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting armor components exhibit improved hardness, toughness, and density, making them more effective in protective applications by providing enhanced resistance to penetration and impact.

Implementation Method 1

hot pressing a mixture comprising a raw material to form a first portion of a body comprising at least about 90 wt % calcium boride compounds and having a density of at least about 80% theoretical density

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHot pressing:

Data Source

PatentUS10247521B2Armor component
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 SAINT GOBAIN CERAMICS & PLASTICS INC
  • US10247521B2 patent drawing
  • US10247521B2 patent drawing
  • US10247521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An armor component including a body having a first portion including calcium boride compounds include non-stoichiometric calcium boride (CaBx) and stoichiometric calcium boride (CaB6) and having a density of at least about 80% theoretical density. In one aspect, the first portion can include a first phase comprising silicon carbide (SiC) and a second phase comprising calcium boride (CaB6). In another aspect, the first portion can further include a third phase comprising boron carbide (B4C).