Automated Calendar Management with ML Task Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer-based systems lack efficient methods for automating electronic calendar management and work task scheduling, particularly in predicting unavailability periods and dynamically securing meeting times, which can lead to inefficiencies and conflicts in scheduling meetings.

Innovation Solution

The system utilizes machine learning models, specifically a task estimation model and a meeting scheduling model, to predict work parameters and unavailability periods based on attendee work history, schedule information, and location data, displaying these predictions to attendees and dynamically securing selected unavailability periods before meetings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated calendar management systems are implemented, then scheduling efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into distinct functional modules: a task estimation machine learning model that predicts work parameters, and a meeting scheduling machine learning model that determines unavailability periods. Each module operates independently with specific responsibilities, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining automation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Machine learning models serve as intermediaries between raw input data (meeting requests, attendee information, work history) and scheduling decisions. These models process and transform data automatically, reducing the need for complex manual scheduling logic while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models predict work parameters and unavailability periods, then scheduling accuracy is improved, but computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling accuracyVSAvoidcomputational requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary computations by training machine learning models on historical work data in advance. Once trained, the models can quickly predict work parameters and unavailability periods during actual scheduling operations, reducing real-time computational requirements while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes historical work data and meeting patterns as feedback to continuously improve model predictions. By learning from past performance data, the models become more accurate over time, allowing for reduced computational resources while maintaining or improving scheduling precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the system dynamically secures unavailability periods, then meeting conflicts are reduced, but automation extent increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconflict reductionVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system proactively identifies and secures unavailability periods before meetings are scheduled by predicting when attendees need to complete work tasks. By reserving these time blocks in advance, the system prevents scheduling conflicts before they occur, improving reliability while managing automation through structured prediction algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20240296427A1Computer-based systems configured for automated electronic calendar management and work task scheduling and methods of use thereof
Publication Date: 2024.09.05 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20240296427A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296427A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296427A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In order to facilitate automated electronic calendar task management with automatic task scheduling, systems and methods are described including receiving and electronic meeting request to schedule a meeting. Work task data items identifying work tasks associated with the attendees are determined. A task estimation machine learning model predicts work parameters of meeting task objects based on the work task data items, and a work history data identifying work history of each attendee. A meeting scheduling machine learning model predicts parameters of unavailability period objects representing unavailability periods required to complete the work tasks based on the meeting task object, schedule information and location information. An indication of the at least one unavailability period is displayed on a screen of a computing device associated with each attendee. Selections of the unavailability period is received from the attendees, and the unavailability period is dynamically secured prior to the meeting.