Calf Hutch Gate and Securing Bar Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing calf hutch enclosures face issues with access and handling, including the risk of tripping hazards from securing bars and deformation during transport, due to the absence of doors and inadequate reinforcement of fence elements.

Innovation Solution

An enclosure design with a gate and securing means attached to the side walls, positioned internally to maintain distance and prevent interference, featuring a ground-level bar that maintains enclosure shape and facilitates tilting without the need for heavy reinforcement or door dismantling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a door is added to the enclosure to allow access, then ease of operation is improved, but the enclosure structure becomes less stable and may deform

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to enclosureVSAvoidenclosure structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the traditional door structure from the enclosure and replaces it with a gate system that is integrated into the front wall. The gate can be opened for access while the surrounding fence structure remains intact and maintains its structural integrity, avoiding the instability caused by traditional door installations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The front wall is segmented into a gate portion and fence portions. The gate is a separate movable element within the front wall structure, allowing access without compromising the overall enclosure framework. This segmentation enables independent movement of the gate while maintaining the stability of the surrounding fence structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If a securing bar is placed at the bottom of the door to join the enclosure, then structural stability is improved, but tripping hazards are created for calves and handlers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenclosure coherenceVSAvoidtripping risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the traditional securing bar that would be positioned at the bottom of a door. Instead, the gate is secured to the front wall structure in a way that does not require a protruding bar at ground level, thus removing the tripping hazard while maintaining enclosure integrity through alternative attachment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The securing mechanism is repositioned from a horizontal bar at ground level to a vertical or angled attachment system integrated into the front wall structure. This dimensional change moves the securing elements away from the calf's movement path while maintaining structural coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If the enclosure is designed as a rectangular shape for ease of manufacture, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the enclosure becomes prone to deformation into a parallelogram during handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverectangular designVSAvoidshape maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetrical bracing elements or diagonal support structures within the rectangular enclosure framework. These asymmetric reinforcements prevent the structure from deforming into a parallelogram while maintaining the overall rectangular external shape for ease of manufacture and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates curved or angled bracing elements that provide structural reinforcement against parallelogram deformation. The curved or angled supports distribute mechanical stresses more effectively than straight horizontal/vertical members, maintaining the rectangular shape during handling and transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Stability of the object's composition

If heavy reinforcement is added to prevent deformation during transport, then structural stability is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape maintenance during transportVSAvoidreinforcement structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement structure is segmented into discrete bracing elements distributed throughout the enclosure framework rather than requiring heavy continuous reinforcement. This segmentation allows for targeted strengthening at critical points while maintaining overall structural efficiency and reducing total material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic bracing elements that can flex or adjust under load rather than rigid heavy reinforcement. This allows the structure to accommodate transport stresses without requiring excessive material, reducing both weight and complexity while maintaining stability during handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2534943B1Enclosure for animal shelter
Publication Date: 2014.01.01 LA BUVETTE
  • EP2534943B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The enclosure (1) has two side walls (3) and a front wall (5) intended to form the enclosure, where the front wall includes a gate (7). A bar (11) is attached by an attachment point at each of the side walls, so as to maintain a constant distance between the attachment points. The bar is placed remote from the end wall and towards the inside of the enclosure, so as not to impede a calf or a person when moving the gate. The bar is placed at the ground level, so as to avoid discomfort to the movement of the calf or the person within the enclosure.