Calibrated Tug Test for Implantable Device Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Operators face challenges in verifying the adequate fixation of implantable medical devices due to variability in the force applied during simple tug tests, as the existing methods do not provide a standardized way to ensure the device is securely fixed to the tissue.

Innovation Solution

A calibrated tug test verification system is introduced, where a core tool is temporarily attached to the device, and a tether with a test segment is used to create a temporary attachment that only releases when a predetermined force greater than or equal to the adequate fixation force is applied, ensuring the device is securely engaged with the tissue.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a simple tug test is performed by an operator, then the device fixation can be tested, but the force applied varies between operators leading to unreliable verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation verification reliabilityVSAvoidoperator variability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the qualitative tug test into a quantitative measurement by introducing a force sensor that measures the exact force required to displace the device. This changes the parameter from subjective operator perception to objective force measurement, eliminating operator variability while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical tug test with a hybrid system that incorporates electronic sensing and digital processing. The force sensor, processor, and display system substitute for manual operator judgment, providing reliable and repeatable fixation verification without compromising operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If no standardized force is applied during tug test, then the procedure remains simple, but adequate fixation cannot be reliably ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation force precisionVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces electronic force sensing and digital processing to replace manual force estimation. The force sensor, processor, and display system provide precise measurement and communication of fixation force, ensuring manufacturing precision while managing device complexity through integrated electronic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital representation of the physical fixation force through the force sensor and processor. This digital copy of the mechanical force allows for precise measurement, comparison against thresholds, and clear communication to the operator, achieving precision without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If a calibrated tug test system is implemented, then reliable fixation verification is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation verification reliabilityVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The force sensor and processing system serve multiple functions: measuring fixation force, comparing against thresholds, generating visual feedback, and potentially guiding the implantation process. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by providing comprehensive verification and control capabilities within a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback loop where the force sensor continuously monitors fixation force, the processor compares it against predetermined thresholds, and the display provides real-time visual feedback to the operator. This feedback mechanism enhances reliability by providing continuous verification while managing complexity through automated processing and clear information presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3125990B1Interventional medical systems, tools, and associated methods
Publication Date: 2020.12.16 MEDTRONIC INC
  • EP3125990B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3125990B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3125990B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A tool of an interventional medical systems system includes a core configured to be temporarily attached to the implantable medical device, as the tool deploys the device to expose a fixation member of the device for engagement with tissue at a target implant site; the core is then employed to verify adequate fixation of the deployed device via a tug test. An operator determines that the device is adequately fixed by the engaged fixation member, if a tug force that is applied to the core modifies the temporary attachment between the core and the device, to allow release of the device from the temporary attachment. A tether, which is fixedly attached to the core, may be employed to create the temporary attachment between the core and the device, or the temporary attachment may be created by a snap fit formed between the core and the attachment structure of the device.