Calibration Pre-Scan for Multi-Spectral MRI Artifact Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D Multi-Spectral Imaging (MSI) techniques for MRI near metallic implants are limited by long scan times, leading to image blurring due to patient movement and inefficiencies in artifact correction, which can be tailored to specific implants.

Innovation Solution

A calibration 'pre-scan' is performed to optimize MSI acquisition by determining the spectral range and reducing the number of spectral bins, using information from the calibration data to guide the MRI scanning and reduce scan time without compromising image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional 3D-MSI techniques acquire sections at discrete Larmor frequency offsets to address magnetic susceptibility artifacts, then artifact correction is improved, but scan time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic susceptibility artifactsVSAvoidscan time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A calibration scan is performed before the actual MSI acquisition to map the magnetic field perturbations caused by the implant. This preliminary action characterizes the susceptibility artifacts in advance, allowing the system to use this information to optimize the subsequent imaging scan parameters and reduce the number of spectral bins needed, thereby reducing scan time while maintaining artifact correction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts imaging parameters based on the calibration data, specifically reducing the number of spectral bins from the conventional twenty or more to a smaller number optimized for the specific implant and patient anatomy. This parameter change maintains adequate artifact correction while significantly reducing scan time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the number of spectral bins is increased to improve artifact correction, then image quality is improved, but patient motion artifacts increase due to longer scan time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidmotion artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes the number of spectral bins based on calibration data specific to each patient and implant configuration. By using fewer bins than conventional methods while maintaining adequate artifact correction, the scan time is reduced, thereby reducing patient motion artifacts while preserving image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration scan automatically characterizes the specific implant and patient anatomy, and the system uses this self-generated information to optimize imaging parameters without requiring manual intervention or trial-and-error adjustments, achieving optimal balance between image quality and motion artifact reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If conventional MSI techniques use fixed scan parameters, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different implant types is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning protocolVSAvoidimplant-specific optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts imaging parameters including spectral bin centers and bandwidth based on calibration data specific to each implant type and patient anatomy. This adaptive parameter optimization improves image quality and reduces artifacts for different implant configurations without requiring complex manual protocol adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration scan automatically characterizes the specific implant and patient anatomy, and the system uses this self-generated information to optimize imaging parameters without requiring manual intervention or trial-and-error adjustments, achieving optimal balance between image quality and motion artifact reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces scan time, minimizes motion artifacts, and improves image resolution, allowing for more efficient and tailored artifact correction specific to the type of metallic implant, enhancing patient comfort and image quality.

Implementation Method 1

magnetic resonance imaging ('MRI')

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

magnetic susceptibility artifacts generated by implants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic susceptibility: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP3295204B1Systems and methods for calibrated multi-spectral magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Date: 2022.11.02 MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
  • EP3295204B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3295204B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3295204B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for performing a calibration "pre-scan" prior to acquiring data using a magnetic resonance imaging ("MRI") system performing a multi-spectral imaging ("MSI") acquisition. Information from the calibration scan is used to optimize the scanning and data collection during the MSI scan. As a result, scan times and motion artifacts are reduced. In addition, image resolution can also be increased, thereby improving image quality. As one example, the MSI acquisition can be a MAVRIC acquisition. In general, the calibration data is used to determine the minimum number of spectral bins required to achieve acceptable image quality near a specific metallic implant or device.