Calibration Wafer Mark Types for Lithography Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for monitoring the lithography process in semiconductor device manufacturing are inefficient and prone to errors due to manual alignment of critical components, leading to inconsistencies and reduced device yields.

Innovation Solution

A calibration wafer with specific mark types is used to facilitate accurate inspection and calibration of the lithography process, including edge bead removal, wafer edge exposure, and wafer identification regions, allowing for precise application of photoresist material and improved process accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual alignment methods are used for critical components in lithography process, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision and manufacturing precision deteriorate due to errors and inconsistencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces calibration wafers with specific mark types as intermediary objects between the manual alignment process and the final measurement. These calibration wafers serve as mediators that enable precise alignment verification without requiring complex automated alignment systems, thus improving measurement precision while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates standardized copies of alignment marks on calibration wafers that can be repeatedly used for verification. These mark patterns serve as reference copies that enable consistent precision measurement across multiple operations without requiring re-calibration, resolving the contradiction between precision and operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If conventional monitoring methods are used for lithography process, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to inefficient and inaccurate monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring efficiencyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary calibration actions using standardized wafers with pre-defined mark patterns before actual lithography production. This preliminary calibration establishes reference parameters that enable faster, more accurate monitoring during production without requiring complex real-time analysis systems, thus improving productivity while limiting complexity growth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the monitoring approach by introducing specific geometric parameters through calibration marks rather than relying on complex process parameters. By transforming the monitoring task into geometric pattern recognition with defined mark types and positions, the system achieves higher efficiency without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If feature size is reduced to increase circuit density, then quantity of devices per wafer increases, but manufacturing precision deteriorates as processes reach their size limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit densityVSAvoidprocess precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the lithography process into distinct calibration and production phases, with dedicated calibration wafers for each process step. By separating the precision verification function from the production function, the system can maintain high manufacturing precision even as feature sizes are reduced to increase circuit density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent addresses the two-dimensional feature size reduction limit by introducing a third dimension of process control through vertical stack calibration marks and multi-layer alignment verification. This dimensional approach allows precision maintenance independent of lateral feature size scaling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9293354B2Apparatus and method for calibrating lithography process
Publication Date: 2016.03.22 SEMICON MFG INT (SHANGHAI) CORP
  • US9293354B2 patent drawing
  • US9293354B2 patent drawing
  • US9293354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A calibration wafer may bear one or more different mark types to facilitate inspection of a lithography process. A first mark type may be located on the outer peripheral portion of the wafer to indicate the desired boundary of an edge bead removal (EBR) region. A second mark type may be located on an outer peripheral portion of the wafer to indicate the desired boundary of a wafer edge expose region (WEE). A third mark type may indicate the border of a portion of the wafer expected to bear a wafer identification mark. A fourth mark type may be located at the center of the wafer to allow for precise and uniform application of liquid photoresist material to the calibration wafer. The calibration wafer may be employed in methods of rapidly and easily assessing the accuracy of various phases of photolithography processes.