Automated Telephone Call Blocking via Callback Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for blocking unwanted telephone calls from inmates or correctional facilities are labor-intensive, prone to accidental or fraudulent blocks, and lack a secure and automated process for verification and documentation.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that receives a request to block calls, provides a confirmation code, initiates a confirmation call to the blocked number, and establishes a block only if the confirmation code is received, using a profile and PIN system to verify the requesting party's authority and reduce fraudulent blocks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple block request method is used (e.g., pressing a DTMF digit), then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability is worsened due to accidental or fraudulent blocks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of blocking callsVSAvoidaccuracy of block requests
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification by calling back the requested number and requiring the answerer to provide a confirmation code before the block is actually implemented. This preliminary action prevents accidental or fraudulent blocks while maintaining operational simplicity for authorized users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where a confirmation code is provided to the caller, then verified by calling back the requested number and comparing the code entered by the answerer. This feedback loop ensures that only authorized parties can initiate blocks, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automated processing is implemented, then the productivity is improved, but the device complexity is worsened due to verification systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of block processingVSAvoidcomplexity of verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-service automation where the telephone network itself performs the verification by calling back the requested number and capturing the confirmation code from the answerer. This eliminates the need for complex external verification systems while maintaining high productivity through fully automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system leverages the existing multi-functionality of the telephone network to perform multiple tasks: initial call routing, confirmation code delivery, verification call initiation, and code comparison. This universal approach achieves automated processing without adding specialized verification equipment, thus improving productivity without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If no confirmation process is used, then the loss of time is reduced, but the object-generated harmful factors are worsened due to fraudulent blocks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to process block requestVSAvoidfraudulent or accidental blocks
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The confirmation code is provided in advance to the caller during the initial block request call. This preliminary action allows for rapid verification during the callback without adding significant time to the overall process, while effectively preventing fraudulent blocks by requiring the answerer to enter the pre-provided code.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8577001B2Methods and systems for controlling the blocking of telephone calls
Publication Date: 2013.11.05 CONFINEMENT TELEPHONY TECH LLC
  • US8577001B2 patent drawing
  • US8577001B2 patent drawing
  • US8577001B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented systems and methods for controlling the blocking of telephone calls are disclosed. A person, for example, bothered by calls from a prison inmate may desire to block future call attempts from that inmate or even desire to block all calls from the confinement/correctional institution at which the inmate is housed. To reduce accidental and fraudulent call blocking, various techniques are used to verify that the party requesting the block is, in fact, the party in control of the telephone number requested to be blocked. Embodiments herein enable call blocking using systems that require little or no human interaction to process a block request, reduce or eliminate accidental blocks via a callback confirmation process, create a documentation trail via the use of a profile and PIN system used for the processing of a block, and/or reduce fraudulent blocks by parties other than those authorized to do so via CNAM (Caller ID) verification.