User Customizable Call Handling via Behavioral Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current user equipment (UE) is unable to handle multiple incoming calls simultaneously without limiting user options, often forcing users to choose between dropping an active or on-hold call when a third call arrives, and system-generated messages lack personal touch, leading to poor customer service experiences.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a user-customizable call handling system that learns from past user behavior to automatically handle incoming calls, suggest personalized messages, and present tailored options, using a machine learning model to infer user preferences and streamline call management in multi-call scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the UE provides limited options for handling the third incoming call (reject or answer with drop), then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecall handling optionsVSAvoiduser choice flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic call handling where the available options and system behavior adapt based on the current call state (active call duration, on-hold call presence, user preferences). The system transitions from static limited options to dynamic contextual options, allowing the UE to provide appropriate handling methods based on real-time call scenarios while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the UE automatically rejects the third incoming call, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecall handling automationVSAvoidcustomer service quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to serve itself by automatically analyzing call scenarios, determining appropriate handling actions, and executing decisions without requiring user intervention. The UE learns from past user decisions and autonomously manages call routing, message generation, and call state transitions, improving ease of operation while maintaining reliability through intelligent automation rather than simple rejection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user responses to automated decisions are learned and stored, continuously improving the system's decision-making accuracy. The feedback loop ensures that automation becomes increasingly reliable over time by adjusting behavior based on actual user preferences and outcomes, resolving the contradiction between automation ease and service reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the UE presents multiple customized options for handling the incoming call, then the adaptability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecall handling optionsVSAvoidsystem processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring user preferences, call handling rules, and message templates before call scenarios occur. The system prepares multiple customized options in advance based on user profiles and historical behavior, so that when calls arrive, the UE can quickly present appropriate options without complex real-time processing, balancing adaptability with manageable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If the system sends preconfigured text messages to rejected callers, then the productivity is improved, but the adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecall handling efficiencyVSAvoidmessage personalization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by customizing message content based on the specific call scenario, caller type, and user preferences rather than using uniform preconfigured messages. The system generates context-appropriate messages (formal for business, casual for personal) while maintaining productivity through automated generation, resolving the contradiction between efficiency and personalization by applying different message qualities locally to different situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10757545B2User customizable handling of multiple calls
Publication Date: 2020.08.25 T MOBILE US INC
  • US10757545B2 patent drawing
  • US10757545B2 patent drawing
  • US10757545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a multi-call scenario, a UE can receive an incoming call while an active call is already established on the UE. In response to receiving the incoming call, a process for handling the incoming call in a user-customizable manner can include accessing a history of user input received by the UE in context of handling multiple contemporaneous calls on the UE, and handling the incoming call based at least in part on the history of the user input. By the UE considering past user input received by the UE in context of handling multiple contemporaneous calls, the UE is configured to learn from past user behavior during multi-call scenarios, and adjust its call handling approach for the incoming call based on the past user behavior.