Caller Security Rating System for Communication Information Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The proliferation of unwanted or devious communications, such as those from marketing organizations, spammers, or criminals, poses a challenge in managing the receipt of communications effectively, as it is difficult to validate the identity of callers and determine the sensitivity of information being requested in real-time, especially with growing fraud mechanisms like internet bots and telemarketing scams.

Innovation Solution

A methodology and system that classify user information into security levels, associate callers with a security rating using caller-identification resources, and provide recommendations on what information to share or withhold based on these ratings, displayed on a receiving device to enhance confidence and security during communications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If caller identification resources are used to validate caller identity and determine security ratings in real-time, then security and reliability of information sharing is improved, but device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes security levels for different types of user information and maintains a database of caller profiles with historical interaction data. When a communication is received, the system retrieves pre-analyzed caller information and matches it against pre-defined security criteria, avoiding the need to analyze every piece of information from scratch in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments user information into distinct security levels (e.g., personal information, financial information, work information) and evaluates each segment independently against the caller's security rating. This allows the system to make granular decisions about what information can be shared, rather than treating all information uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If comprehensive caller validation and security rating analysis are performed for every communication, then information security is improved, but time consumption and processing delay increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial validation by focusing analysis only on the specific type of information being requested and the caller's relevant historical behavior patterns. Rather than conducting a complete re-validation of the caller's identity and intent for every communication, the system applies targeted security checks based on the context of the current interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Caller security ratings and profiles are established and updated in advance based on historical interactions, allowing the system to make rapid security assessments during actual communications by comparing current requests against pre-established baseline behavior patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system provides detailed recommendations and visual indicators for each type of information, then user confidence and security awareness are improved, but ease of operation decreases due to information overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser confidenceVSAvoiduser interface simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides security recommendations and visual indicators specifically tailored to the type of information being discussed in the current communication. Rather than displaying all possible security warnings simultaneously, the interface highlights only the security considerations relevant to the immediate context, making the information digestible and actionable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If the system monitors and analyzes all communication content in real-time to provide security recommendations, then detection precision is improved, but use of energy and computational resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and analyzes only the critical security-relevant features from communication content, such as the type of information being requested and the caller's identity indicators. Rather than processing and analyzing every word and detail of the communication, the system focuses computational resources on the specific elements that determine security risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9078134B2Security recommendations for providing information in a communication system
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 LENOVO GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US9078134B2 patent drawing
  • US9078134B2 patent drawing
  • US9078134B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of and system for receiving a communication is disclosed. A receiving device receives the communication. The method and system classify user information into a set of security levels. A caller from a source of potential callers is associated with a security rating within the set of security levels. Using at least one caller-identification resource, the communication can be identified as being related to the caller with the security rating. The method and system determine a recommendation for providing user information. The recommendation may be based on the security rating within the set of security levels. The determined recommendation for providing user information in response to the communication is issued.